Cornelia Te

Hello, Cornelia Te. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Ry's the Guy ^{(talk|contribs)} 09:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Rystheguy, thank you very much for sharing this information with me. Cornelia Te (talk) 07:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Cornelia Te

August 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nestlé may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• renewal-of-tour-de-fra#.VL1x00fF-So], "Nestlé confirms sponsorship renewal of Tour de France"]</ref>
• and the development of education resources for use at the AIS and in the public domain.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iaaf.org/news/press-release/nestle-becomes-main-sponsor-of-world-wide-iaa</

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

ping Controversy_and_Criticisms_2

sorry forgot to ping yoy see my comment on the talk page for the Nestle article ChristopheT (talk) 09:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)