Cougars2012

No problem.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

• Glad to do it and I'm glad they enjoyed it. Have fun with the group!--PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Five Leaf Clover
File:From End to Beginning.jpg
Background information
Origin	Due West, South Carolina, USA
Genres	Lip Sync Pop Rock Teen pop Adult contemporary
Years active	2008-present
Labels	DHS Records
Members	Reggie Patterson Russ Tollison Kovonn Tanner Ricky Patterson Robert Burnett
Website	Five Leaf Clover YouTube Channel Five Leaf Clover Facebook Page

Five Leaf Clover or FLC is a lip sync group who got their fame on YouTube. The group consists of five members: brothers Reggie and Ricky Patterson, Kovonn Tanner, Robert Burnett, and Russ Tollison.

History

The beginning of Five Leaf Clover started in April of 2008 when member Reggie released a YouTube cover of JoJo's hit song, Too Little, Too Late. The video quickly gained popularity and had about 4,000 views when it was removed for unknown reasons. It has recently resurfaced on Five Leaf Clover's YouTube Page. With the original and new videos, it currently has about 5,000 views.

In January of 2009 Five Leaf Clover released their first music video as a group. The covered the Backstreet Boys' song, Shape of My Heart.

The Future

In February or March of 2009, Five Leaf Clover will release their second group video. This one will be I Still... by the Backstreet Boys. It is rumored that "I Still..." will be a darker themed video.

Notes section

I'm not sure why it's coming up the way it is. You should be OK to edit the page. Yell if you're still having issues. Thanks! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: Brian Littrel/Straight Through My Heart (image)

Im afraid the image does not show something which cannot be explained in words and therefore it is a candidate for deletion. Now that it has been tagged one of the experienced members of administrators team who deal with copyright issues will assess the issue and deal with it accordingly. It is a candidate for deletion - this is exactly what happened to the image that was present in She Wolf (song). (Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:42, 17 September 2009 (UTC))

Backstreet Boys

Yep. I removed mention of the Jackson 5 a couple weeks ago, and have had to correct that the Backstreet Boys are the best selling, twice, since. Guess that needs to be there, after all. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 17:50, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Figuring out what to do with Backstreet Boys

Hi. I'd forgotten we'd talked, so forgive my revert.

My impression was that an editor was trying to avoid an ongoing edit war by changing the wording so that it wasn't such a red flag to vandals. What I noticed is that any mention of them being "second best selling" -- whether or not it mentioned the Jacksons -- was targeted by a vandal. Factually, it's more exact to say they were second. Pragmatically, it might be better not to wave a red flag in front of the bulls (or rather the vandals) who don't like the idea that Backstreet Boys are second best. I really don't have any strong opinion ... I was just hoping not to revisit the article again and again for the same vandalism. Best Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Bigger. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A8UDI 17:40, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cougars2012. You have new messages at A8UDI's talk page.
Message added 20:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A8UDI 20:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Dance with Me (Aaron Carter song)

I have nominated Dance with Me (Aaron Carter song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance with Me (Aaron Carter song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Wolfer68 (talk) 03:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

A release of a single does not make it notable. Per WP:NSONGS, "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable." I do not believe this song has achieved any of that. --Wolfer68 (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Independently means both Aaron Carter and Flo Rida would each have had to record the song separately. The single was released on November 10 and it has not shown any signs of independent notability. If you think it's going to be notable that goes against WP:CRYSTAL, because it's not yet. --Wolfer68 (talk) 19:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Straight Through My Heart clip.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Straight Through My Heart clip.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dance With Me AC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dance With Me AC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:29, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Backstreet Boys

I have reverted your recent edit at Backstreet Boys as you had inserted a statement without providing a source. I have done a lot of cleaning up at that article and have detected a lot of unreferenced statements as well as poorly referenced statements, all of which desperately needed to be removed. Please, do not ignore my hours of work; however, feel free to re-insert the statement within your recent edit here if you can come forward with a reliable source. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Please, do not revert edits as such conduct clearly constitutes edit-warring. As much as you feel it's important to include additional information such as the one you insist on inserting, bear in mind that statements must be verifiable by editors. Therefore, I suggest that you first locate the source then re-insert any further information. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 04:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Playlist: The Very Best of Backstreet Boys for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Playlist: The Very Best of Backstreet Boys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playlist: The Very Best of Backstreet Boys until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Playlist backstreetboys.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Playlist backstreetboys.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:58, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)