Counterershabeer

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Little Review has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Little Review was changed by Counterershabeer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897261 on 2017-01-24T11:31:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Little Review. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 11:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gilli (film), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gilli (film) was changed by Counterershabeer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884727 on 2017-01-24T14:46:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Counterershabeer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Counterershabeer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

A couple of things...

Hi there, re: some of your recent edits, a few things...

• Re: this, Wikipedia would prefer we not add our personal observations, especially our editorials and fluffy praise, to articles.
• Re: this, blogs are not sufficient as references, since anyone with an internet connection can start a blog and print whatever they want. Please see WP:UGC
• Re: this, the tone is inappropriate and the grammar/typography is problematic.

If you have questions, please feel free to respond below. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:50, 28 January 2017 (UTC)