Cptmurdok

Welcome

Hello, Cptmurdok! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contribution. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Fences&Windows 00:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Flash Rodriguez Music Executive

Flash Rodriguez is verified in numerous video clips listed in the references. In addition to appearing on numerous music media websites such as Global Grind and all hip hop.com. In addition, news stories linking him to celebrities and credits listed on fancast.com IMDB and the nytimes film page. I feel deletion is unwarranted and the page should stand as it does fit the criteria requirements. --Themusicinsider (talk) 00:26, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Kim Komando

You should really try listening to her. She's really clueless, and you can tell that when she's giving her computer advice she's just reading stuff off of her monitor that she doesn't even understand. She's an idiot's idiot. 98.71.245.241 (talk) 00:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

RE: Patrolling pages

Thank you for your advice. However, I am not sure what you mean. Would you please direct me to the proper wiki guideline page? Reply on my talk page. Thank you very much. N419BH (talk) 21:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

I was actually looking for new users and checking their pages to provide them the appropriate welcome message. Thank you for making me aware of the existence of the patrol group. I have joined, added Twinkle, and am now doing both projects at the same time. Thank you! N419BH (talk) 00:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Bison Strength Equipment, LLC Update - Notability

Hello, please advise on the Bison Strength Equipment, LLC update. Thanks! --Jason J Holmes (talk) 18:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Jason J Holmes

Speedy deletion declined: Clay G Wescott

Hello Cptmurdok. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Clay G Wescott, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. GedUK  19:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

The Allie Brosh Article

Thank you for your helpful comment regarding Wikipedia's article guidelines. However, I have no personal association with the people or placed mentioned in the Allie Brosh article and made every attempt to maintain NPOV and establish notability. Alataristarion (talk) 15:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch FC

That village really exists (as you probably know) and it really has a football team, which already has an article at Llanfairpwll F.C.; so rather than delete this hoax one I have redirected it to that. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 18:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Alex Day article

Since you first reviewed this article and tagged it for multiple issues, I've made extensive edits. I deleted all but two of the external links. I tried to add more context and smooth out the timeline, to deal with the concern about 'recentism'. And as for the notability issue, which I consider the most serious, I've reorganized the article and added more content and more citations, to make this person's notability more apparent. Also, on the article's Discussion page, I've made extensive notes about this notability problem - which I'm struggling to understand, I must admit. One thing I did on the Discussion page was create a Notability Matrix for this person, in which I list all the relevant Wikipedia notability criteria, the corresponding assertions made in the article, and the citations supporting those assertions. I think there's more than enough to support Alex Day's notability, but I wonder if you'd have time to take a look at the edited article, and the Discussion page, and especially the Notability Matrix, and then consider removing some or all of the issue tags. I'd welcome any comments you'd care to make on the article's Discussion page or on my talk page, but I'll watch this page for any response you make here. Thanks for your help.

Bill Moran
Wmoran9550 (talk) 09:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Randy Komisar article

Hai, randy is author of 2 books and they are also referred by university for study, do not you think it worth notable work ? Viral sachde (talk) 18:10, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Shoe Store

Hello Cptmurdok, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Shoe Store has been removed. It was removed by 67.52.249.218 with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 67.52.249.218 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 09:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

JD Doyle

Could you clarify the concern about JD Doyle's notability? He has a large international audience through his various shows. Riedelbs (talk) 01:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Cptmurdok! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cuchifritos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominican cuisine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Cptmurdok,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cptmurdok. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cptmurdok. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cptmurdok. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cptmurdok. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)