Your submission at AfC Lady Esther was accepted

edit
 
Lady Esther, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC Arnstein & Lehr, LLP was accepted

edit
 
Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 08:43, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arnstein & Lehr, LLP has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis A. Lehr, Jr. (October 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. DGG ( talk ) 03:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


Avoid "successful", "prominent", "pre-eminent", "leading", and other peacock words.
No honorifics: they come across as smarmy and deferential. This is an encyclopedia; Lehr is Lehr, not "Mr. Lehr" or "Attorney Lehr" or "Louis A. Lehr, Jr., Esq."
Notability is not contagious; we don't care how famous his clients are, that doesn't help him "catch" their notability. Instead: to what extent, if at all, has his work been written about in legal journals, or in publications of general circulation such as BARRON'S, Asahi Shimbun or O Globo?
If you work for him or his firm, openly disclose that connection on your talk- and/or user-pages. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014

edit

  Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses. Wikipedia is not the Yellow pages. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. You seem to be editing almost exclusively articles connected with Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, often to insert there name as the attorney for some particular business. Most of these are excessive detail and have been reverted by various editors, including myself. DGG ( talk ) 23:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis A. Lehr, Jr. (January 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. — kikichugirl speak up! 06:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Crash2341, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — kikichugirl speak up! 06:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Louis A. Lehr, Jr. concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Louis A. Lehr, Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Louis A. Lehr, Jr.

edit
 

Hello, Crash2341. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Louis A. Lehr".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis A. Lehr (March 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buddy Charles (December 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 23:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Buddy Charles concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Buddy Charles, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:49, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Buddy Charles concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Buddy Charles, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply