Cratylus3

Dead Souls

Thanks for adding info about the Dead Souls mudlib, now I don't have to update it myself :P --Atari2600tim 19:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yatmim

Yatmim has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 22:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Userboxes

Hi, Crat. I'm just here pimping the set of LP-related userboxes I just made. It is my earnest hope that you'll like them and tell all your friends. There's even a "public lib maintainer" one for you. :) Chaos5023 19:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Question

Have you actually read the meme you're defending? -Jéské ^{(v^_^v Kacheek!)} 20:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Heh yeah pretty far out. It doesn't have to be pleasing to be a noteworthy meme. Cratylus3 21:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

But it still has to have something to do with Mudkip in order to include it in Mudkip's section. All it has to do with is a schoolboy raping a Mudkip doll, not a Mudkip itself.

May I suggest pestering List of Internet phenomena? -Jéské ^{(v^_^v Kacheek!)} 22:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

That is a reasonable position, but I would suggest that an idea/symbol/etc is subject to changes in understanding irrespective of the original intent. It may well be that Mudkip *had* nothing to do with the current mudkip meme. Just like the swastika *had* nothing to do with German Nazis. But now they are both colored by their use, not just their original intent, and suggesting Mudkip has nothing to do with the mudkip meme is like saying the swastika has nothing to do with nazis. True to an extent, but not a sufficiently meaningful one. Cratylus3 22:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Er, Whoops

I didn't look at the talk history right. Looking at it like this it looked like the only change was the move itself. I undid that to keep it chonological though had I realized that there was an addition of content I would've done it manually so as not to delete your comment. My apologies, and I should have double checked myself. Cheers. -WarthogDemon 01:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

AN/I Thread

WP:AN/I#Cratylus3 (talk · contribs) baiting me. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v Mrrph-mph!)} 01:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Lol, backfired. Againatomsismyname (talk) 14:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

It seems to have scrolled off. How do I access it again? Cratylus3 (talk) 12:55, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Ah never mind. Here it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=230156728#Cratylus3_.28talk_.C2.B7_contribs.29_baiting_me

Mudkip Mania Again

Could you stop by Talk:List of Pokémon (241-260) real quick and discuss, please? -Jéské Couriano ^{(v^_^v)} 05:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

I think your incitement of other editors to do this stuff is in very poor taste and judgment. I hope you demonstrate the integrity to put a stop to it, administrator. Cratylus3 (talk) 05:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cratylus3. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)