Crichm3
| This user is a student editor in Louisiana_State_University/Environmental_physiology_(Fall_2021) . |
Welcome!
editHello, Crichm3, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Rhim gazelle peer review
editThis article provides a lot of good information on the Rhim gazelle and the new information regarding heterothermy is precisely worded making it easy to understand. The article may benefit by adding a new section that better fits the additional information about adaptations for a desert environment instead of adding it to the "Distribution and Habitat" section. This new section would allow readers to better understand how Rhim gazelle survive in their habitat and allows for more contributions about the topic to be added later. This proposed addition of a new section after the "Distribution and Habitat" section is important because it will help the flow of the article to be maintained. Currently, the new information added to the "Distribution and Habitat" section does not seem to fit the best and convolutes the topic being focused on in that section. Looking at the Wikipedia article, all of the sections seem to be fairly equal in length and importance with the exception of the "In philately" section. This section does not seem to contain information that is beneficial in better understanding the Rhim Gazelle and could be considered a little bit off topic. Overall, this article is neutral and is backed by reliable sources, but could benefit by adding information backed by an additional reliable source. Abihoover (talk) 18:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Abihoover