Crnizmaj

Your draft article, Draft:Miloš Ćorlomanović

Hello, Crnizmaj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miloš Ćorlomanović".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miloš Ćorlomanović (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miloš Ćorlomanović and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miloš Ćorlomanović, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Crnizmaj! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miloš Ćorlomanović (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miloš Ćorlomanović and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miloš Ćorlomanović, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 07:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miloš Ćorlomanović (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miloš Ćorlomanović and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miloš Ćorlomanović, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 01:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Help around the source

I would ask the reviewer to help me define an independent source. I wonder what your independent sources are and can you give me a specific source that I want to give you about the respective academician Milos Corlomanovic? Namely, I have listed all sources in the digital form referring to the parts of the subject's biography, which are in the reference section, as well as several shows in the official state media of the Republic of Serbia in which the biographical reports of the aforementioned subject are mentioned, which I consider to be factually independent sources. These sources are in the external link section and are copyrights about the subject (Academician Miloš Ćorlomanović) for whom he has copyright and which he gave to a third person to put on you tube. These shows, unfortunately, are not in English, they are already in Serbian, and I believe you do not understand them. The touch academician Miloš Ćorlomanović is indeed an academician of science, with a title that in the Soviet system of decorations carries the highest academic award, which is of importance in front of the Doctor of Science, which is still applied in Russia and China today. I emphasized this with the title because I see one of the reviewers here wondering what the title is. Here I have solved the given mystery and Miloš Ćorlomanović It is indeed an academician with the highest meaning of this title, and not with the meaning of a teacher. The only evidence I can apply on this is to review his admission letter because the Chinese Academy of Sciences itself does not provide public information about its academics for security reasons, and such rules are normal in the People's Republic of China. Therefore, this article is generally of a general character and only shows the basic biographies and domain of the subject concerned, without entering into the details of his biography, the family's origin of the subject or the exact chronology of his discoveries. Therefore, could you please tell me what are the appropriate sources for the English Wikipedia, if they are not official state media of the Republic of Serbia, a few shots, as well as an article from the official newspaper People's Republic of China? Because all of these sources are normally accepted in the Serbian wikipedia. What I just wanted to do is the same such an article in English as it can exist in the Russian language when I find someone who will translate the text, or in Chinese, for example. Thank you for your understanding.Crnizmaj (talk) 22:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Miloš Ćorlomanović

Hello, Crnizmaj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miloš Ćorlomanović".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:44, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miloš Ćorlomanović

The article Miloš Ćorlomanović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person is a crackpot pseudoscientist who is abusing Wikipedia in multiple languages to simulate credibility.

I have detailed my objections to the Serbian wiki page of this man here sr:Википедија:Трг/Архива/Разно/68#Псеудонаука_на_српској_википедији, after which the admins voted to delete the page and did so. The user Crnizmaj deleted the votes and the discussion, and tried to undelete the page, but the page was deleted again.

To give a brief summary for the request:

- all the references point to either non-existent academic institutions or Serbian tabloids

- this person doesn't hold any degree whatsoever

- this person is not listed in Google Scholar or in any similar database, nor has he published a single peer-reviewed article

- the fashionably nonsensical word salad and shameless self-promotion are glaring

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the, but other exist. In particular, the process can result in deletion without discussion, and allows discussion to reach for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

It is false that this person has no referenced works and they are listed in the article references. There are references that lead to google scholar where it is seen that there are almost 400 reviews https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=PLLmrOAAAAAJ, as well as to the page of the University of Dubna https://lib.uni-dubna.ru/MegaPRO/Download/MObject/10605#page=2 in Russia where there are reviews, and there are also newspaper articles from the Chinese Times https://www.lifetimes.cn/article/9CaKrnK5VFd , which is a state newspaper. When I made this article, such rules were in force and this was 7 years ago. Then I respected everything for the category of living persons and that is why the article passed. It's simply unbelievable to me that an article can be there for 7 years and only then be removed. Also, for some reason, newly posted references are ignored on the Serbian Wikipedia. I know that this article of mine on the Serbian Wikipedia was deleted for political reasons and has nothing to do with the validity of the references. This is a well-known Serbian scientist whom the Society of American Serbs in 2019 counted among the 20 most famous Serbian scientists in the field of natural sciences https://www.rts.rs/lat/rts/Dijaspora/vesti/3665541/cikago-izlozba-o-poznatim-srbima.html, it is also referenced. Crnizmaj (talk) 23:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)