Ctoegap

Blocking other users

Hi Ctoegap. Thanks for your concern and your post on my talk page.

Here is what I can find consists the "disruption" that you are accusing me of.

• vandalism;
• gross incivility;
• harassment;
• spamming;
• edit warring, especially breaches of the three-revert rule;
• breaching the policies or guidelines, especially the sock puppetry policy;
• attempts to coerce actions of editors through threats of actions outside the Wikipedia processes, whether onsite or offsite.

The only one I may have violated is the three-revert rule, which I was not aware was a rule. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and I will keep it in mind when editing pages in the future. Patrick478 (talk) 06:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Please actual discuss editting issues on the talk page instead of personal user page

Instead of writing on my page, why don't you actually come to the talk page and discuss matters then instead of the empty threats of bans. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 08:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Anthony Hudson (manager)

WP:DAILYMAIL is of questionable reliability at best. Jim1138 (talk) 08:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)