Cultcontri

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Yadav". Thank you.

attention!

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Yadav. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 18:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Yadav of haryana

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Yadav of haryana, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.haryana-online.com/People/ahirs.htm. As a copyright violation, Yadav of haryana appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Yadav of haryana has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Yadav of haryana and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Yadav of haryana with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Yadav of haryana.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 09:36, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Yadav. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 09:41, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Yadav

I just wanted to let you know that it is totally fine to pursue dispute resolution on the issue of concern at [[Yadav] and its talk page. However, please be sure not to revert on the article any more, as that would probably result in you crossing WP:3RR and thus being blocked. Additionally, please don't call people's edits "vandalism" unless the meet the very narrow definition found at WP:VANDAL. Using that term inappropriately can be considered a personal attack. Note that WP:VANDAL explicitly says that content disputes, disagreements about WP:NPOV, or style issues do not fall under the category of vandalism. Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:10, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Yadav. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:24, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

• You were explicitly warned, both here and at Talk:Yadav, of what would happen if you continued edit-warring - yet you carried on anyway. Also, in a content dispute, you should not accuse those who disagree with you of vandalism - a content dispute is explicitly *not* vandalism. If there is a disputed change that you wish to make, you need to discuss it on the Talk page and wait for a consensus to emerge - then only if the consensus supports you can you make the change. If you resume edit-warring when your block expires, you should expect to be blocked for longer.