Cunningham

A capital comment

Are you related to e. e. cummings? Dbiv 17:56, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Rainbow Bridge

Hi Cunningham - the way to leave a message to someone else is to view their user page and then click the "Discussion" tab, and leave a message. Or you can just type "User talk:Lir", or whoever, in the "search" box, and click "go". Then edit the page. Next time the person logs on, a message at the top will say "You have new messages" with a link.

On Rainbow Bridge, I remembered buying the LP at a swap meet 20 years ago. Somewhere it sits, molding. I was briefly excited to see that it was collectible, but then my rigorous check on its collectibility was to do an ebay search, where it appears to cost five bucks for a better version than mine. Tempshill 01:30, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Moneypenny

Not to say I doubt you or anything, but can I ask how you know this? K1Bond007 20:39, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

Nevermind, I see it's on their website now. Thanks for the update :) Would still like to know how you knew this though. K1Bond007 04:49, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

Faversham edit

Agreed re your point about Faversham! I tried a more appropriate reference to chavs in the Faversham page this morning.... and also widened the background material about Faversham history and features. Hope someone will now expand and improve it. I became so carried away that I forgot to sign in then (86.137.168.64=--Farsee50 21:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)!)

My shortcuts

citation needed =

{{Cleanup}}

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages

Higham ref

Thanks for digging out that ref in Higham, Kent. Do you know if it's still relevant to this page? I moved quite a lot of material from this article to Thames and Medway Canal, and I suspect the Stephen Raynor ref should now be in the canal page only. Cheers, JackyR | Talk 19:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Somerville and Ross

While I have often heard that my cousion of Ross was lesbian, I have yet to see or hear any good evidence backing this up. I am not objecting to her sexuality, if this indeed was the case; just don't see any evidence for it. Unless you have something at least persusaive, I would remove the wording. Fergananim 17:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello Cunningham

Sorry to be long getting back to you, but you left your comment at the bottom of my user page instead of my talk page. Anyway, as I said, I still have to come across such a direct comment by either of them . Again, I must stress that I am not objecting to their sexuality, if this was indeed the case (more power to them), just that I have never come across anything (yet) to back this up. And I have read a good deal of their corrospondence, and Voilet's journals. If its alright with you, I will remove the reference till someonce can provide a citation. Voilet herself does make clear in her letters that she fancied both her cousion Archer Martin of Toronto and W.B.Yeats. Cheers! Fergananim 18:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Harold Shipman

I notice in your recent edit to Harold Shipman you removed wikilinking from dates. Please do not do this as it is necessary to allow user date display preferences to work. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers). -- Arwel (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Collaboration 18th - 25th March 2007

- Olive Oil -_ŢάĽɮ - 14:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Rothley- and currencies

The £ is used in a number of countries. For instance Ireland and England. The pound does not have the same value. Luckily Wikipedia has recorded that the GB£ is different. That way a computer could translate this into any currency.... assuming someone doesnt correct it. Can you fix. Victuallers 10:48, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hi there! Thanks for your edits to Wikipedia! However, don't forget that using the edit summary box (below) will help everyone, as you describe the changes you've made, so we don't have to sift through the history to see what you've done. With regards, Lradrama 14:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Clarence Mitchell

Can you put your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clarence Mitchell before he is deleted ! Thanks GrahamHardy 10:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

P.S. I think the edit box below belongs to the section above but an attempt to move it ended in disaster ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrahamHardy (talk • contribs) 10:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cat and mouse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cat and mouse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Derek and the Dominos

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Derek and the Dominos/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Shovell grave wiki.jpg

File:Shovell grave wiki.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Shovell grave wiki.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Shovell grave wiki.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:25, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Cunningham! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Martin Brunt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:55, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Arthur martin-leake.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arthur martin-leake.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 17:06, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Rochester: Kent or Medway

There is a discussion in which you may be interested on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_geography#Medway_or_Kent concerning the move of Wikipedia articles from Rochester, Kent to Rochester, Medway. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 12:33, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Goal-running.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan 16:21, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Use of Jezreel's Tower image in publication

Hello, Cunningham. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 17:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Victoria County History - EB (talk) 17:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Goal-running concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Goal-running, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Goal-running

Hello Cunningham. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled Goal-running.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Goal-running}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1977 Dutch train hostage crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RMS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The No Spam Barnstar
	From Dfrr Dfrr (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cunningham. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cunningham. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cunningham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cunningham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leslie Phillips, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Goal-running

Hello, Cunningham. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Goal-running, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Goal-running

Hello, Cunningham. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Goal-running".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)