Curatorslog

Curatorslog, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Curatorslog! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:11, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

List of Belgian artists moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Belgian artists, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:List of Belgian artists concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Belgian artists, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CASSTL

The article CASSTL has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable & does little to establish in simplified terms what the entire article is all about, a before however shows no evidence of true notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Celestina007 (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Belgian artists

Hello, Curatorslog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Belgian artists".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

You can get this draft back by following these instructions, if desired.ThatMontrealIP (talk)

independent sources

Hello! Just anote that I reverted your edit here. The artist's gallery is not an independent source. They will publish anything and say anything in the name of promotion and sales, so we generally do not use them. Their writing is basically also coming directly from the artist. If you can find an independent source that says the same thing, the item can be added back. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:33, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

List of catalogues

I like what you did on Lionel Esteve, but I am not sure it is in the right place. Usually (I think, not an expert in this area) books that are not actually used as references would be in their own section, like "publications". There is actually a manual of style for that, here in case you are interested. Someone will probably come along and fix it in the next one month to ten years though! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

List of catalogues - answer

Thank you for your comment. I am still working on the page and am actually using these publications to construct my article.Curatorslog Curatorslog (talk) 01:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

sure, if you need help let me know. The preference on Wikiepdia is for inline sources, where the claim is immediately followed by an inline source. There is a page on it here. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia

Hello! I just reverted your change to the lede of the Carla Arocha article. Obviously you are skilled in the area of art history, but on Wikipedia we do things a little differently. There is no room for original research or writing in the first person (as in "think of X form the 1970s"). We also have a standard for the lede section that basically says it should summarize the article. Placing along quote that takes up 40% of the lede means that the article veers away form the subject and into interpretation immediately, placing WP:UNDUE attention on interpretation rather than the subject. I guess what I am trying to say is that Wikipedia is not a publishing platform for original thought or interpretation. It's actually something very boring: a neutral restatement of old facts. That said, I think you will be a quite good editor. There are some policies to learn though! Sorry about that aspect of Wikipedia.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Carla Arocha and Stéphane Schraenen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Formal, Sensory, Conceptual and Figuration

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Exhibitions Curated by Catherine de Zegher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Dance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

NPOV noticeboard notice

I opened the topic at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Catherine de Zegher concerning de Zegher article.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Curatorslog. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Catherine de Zegher, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:32, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catherine de Zegher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tunga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)