Cvcaudill

Cvcaudill, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cvcaudill! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Cvcaudill, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Ali's Peer Review: "Emotional Eating"

Hi Tori,

I agree with you that this article has a lot of information that does not seem pertinent to the topic, and that the author seems biased in that not all points of view are represented. I appreciated how added other perspectives and concepts to the Background and Characteristics sections, providing alternating viewpoints. This creates a more reliable article in that it allows the reader to get more information by analyzing each side and being able to come to their own conclusions or opinions. I also liked how you divided the Characteristics section into short paragraphs, separated by the points they are making.

Other than that, I think I would like to see you edit more sections from this article (especially in treatment), since there is an obvious bias that the author only really focused on emotional eating in a negative light, rather than all aspects of it. I think you could also use more reliable references since there only seems to be one reference you have cited in the article.

Your edits look great overall and you are clearly knowledgeable of your topic. Good work.

Aliyahz (talk) 00:22, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Nicole's Peer Review for Emotional Eating Hi Cvcaudill, I think the subject of your article that you are working on is very interesting. I think it is very important that you mention how people thought of emotional as a disease and why it is now considered not to be. It would have been easier to peer review your article if you copied your article to your sandbox and then showed what all needs to be deleted. It is important that people can know what you are thinking about editing so others can see if you should. But overall I really like the comments you made. I like how easy it is to understand the subjeCT. I think you have a clear outline but would recommend not having the edits that you made all in one paragraph. Some information looked like it should be under a different headline. Your sources look reliable also. After reading your edits I do understand the importance of emotional eating. I think you give more concentration on how to define emotional eating. Maybe you should also talk about how different people are affected and how someone could help get past being an emotional eater. The definition of emotional eating is very redundant. Overall great job and can not wait to read it once it is completed.Nicole6794 (talk) 01:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)