Cyberpathfinder

Just to let you know I posted this on the Talk page and the Dispute Resolution noticeboard and on the talk page of FreeKnowledge:

FreeKnowledge, what might seem a minor change to you might not seem minor to other editors in this very sensitive section. For example, the parenthetical passage you have removed("he was no longer impelled towards men") might seem redundant, but emphasizes the fact that the change being described was not simply a change in behavior but a change in physical response. This is the most contentious aspect of the article, and it concerns living persons. I'm not going to revert but will wait for other editors to weigh in, and unlike my change regarding eugenics above (which nobody seems to care about), I think there will be comments on this change. For myself, although I am not one of those personally involved, I think the deleted parenthetical passage clarifies the nature of the change and therefore should be reverted. Trouver (talk) 15:33, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	We all want you to know how much your work on this very contentious article is appreciated. Trouver (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)