Your submission at Articles for creation: William Arribart (August 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 14:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Cyrion20! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 14:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mandatory paid editing disclosure

edit
 

Hello Cyrion20. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cyrion20. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cyrion20|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Jytdog (talk) 17:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


Hello, Sorry it's my first edit here and I hope I'm doing things correctly. I don't have any relation (paid or unpaid) with William Arribart or his producer for this article. I'm just a fan writing an article about him with things from his website. I don't want to infringe Wikipedia's guidelines. However, this article will be to be deleted as far as it's in the English section instead of the French section.

Best regards,

--Cyrion20 (talk) 19:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Cyrion20Reply

Draft:William Arribart

edit
 

Hello, Cyrion20. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:William Arribart.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply