D.Lazard

Safe Primes, in RSA

Ok, let's try to discuss here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:RSA_(cryptosystem)#Safe_Primes,_in_RSA_Key_Generation No "reliable sources" are needed here. Here you just need to think with your own head. This is math. In any case, I do not owe you anything, and I do not demand anything from you.

Coordinate Systems and Analytic Geometry

Moved to Talk:Cartesian coordinate system

 – Nothing personal in this discussion

Modified "primorial" method, called nabla-deltorial

A modification of the "primorial" method was created, called nabla-deltorial, symbolically designated as ∇Δ(pₙ), and although the initial measurements of the "primorial" were ambitiously aimed at breaking (among other things) also cipher codes, it is still far from that. However, factoring large numbers with divisors of "intermediate" size, i.e. not too high - is supposed to go "surprisingly" smoothly.

The "paper" is available here: https://www.1universe.gpe.pl/prime/deltorial.html

I will soon start writing an entry about it on Wikipedia, its name will be nabla-deltorial ∇Δ      - I recommend it to your attention, and greetings to the titans of work...

BaSzRafael (talk) 10:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

To editor BaSzRafael: It seems that you have not understood the main reason of the deletion of your Wikipedia article. Per policy WP:OR, for being mentioned in Wikipedia, a mathematical result or method must have been published in a regular mathematical journal. This is not sufficient, the subject must having been discussed in a independent WP:secondary source. Also, the secondary soure muust clarify whether the result or method is important or notable.

The "paper" that is linked above is far to be ready for a publication in a journal. So, mentioning it in a Wikipedia article would go against the basic policies of Wikipedia. D.Lazard (talk) 13:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Regarding 0.999...

Hi. Please use smaller edits when an article is under considerable discussion. Please sign your Talk page additions, that is policy WP:SIGN. Please use the Talk page Reply feature not direct edit. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Just to be clear, I reverted your edits primarily because a version of the lede had just been agreed. You are welcome to join the conversation and convince us on a different version. Other aspects of you edit got reverted because they were bundled with the change to the lede. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to "Determinant"

Hi, thanks for catching that error in my edit to the intro to "Determinant." I think the introduction is still a bit inadequate, and started the relevant discussion on the talk page. Cooljeff3000 (talk) 12:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)