DESK JOVI

Grammar at Demi Lovato

Hi! Please read MOS:OXFORD. You'll find that Wikipedia's Manual of Style policies state that an article should be consistent with regards to using the oxford comma. The rest of the article uses it, so the opening sentence should too. Thanks! GrammarDamner (talk) 17:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. GrammarDamner (talk) 18:24, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 18:47, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DESK JOVI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologise for my actions and now realise why a serial comma is relevant to such articles, i will take heed and be more careful in future. DESK JOVI (talk) 21:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Welp, I'm afraid you've bigger issues than the Oxford comma. Edit warring, other disruption. I'm afraid you will need to review the discussions you've removed from your talk page and think deeply about what others have tried to tell you.. -- Deepfriedokra 21:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DESK JOVI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In future instead of just edit warring I'll create a discussion to come to an agreement with other editors so that conflict is avoided and collaboration is paramount. DESK JOVI (talk) 22:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

After our previous discussion, you have repeatedly proven to be unable to do this. Please do not make another unblock request within the next six months. If you ignore this advice, your access to this talk page may be revoked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.