Archive 60Archive 62Archive 63Archive 64

Tech News: 2024-44

MediaWiki message delivery 20:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

"Gomberg radical reaction" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Gomberg radical reaction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 29 § Gomberg radical reaction until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Unnecessary reverts in environmental articles.

I recently added a link to "Islamic Environmentalism" to pertinent environmental articles, given that they included various other envionmental relevant links. However, my edits were reverted without a clear rationale. Especially articles that deal with religious philosophies like "Christian views on environmentalism" and "Judaism and environmentalism" and "Environmental philosophy" were all WP:Relevant to this link. Honestly, your aggressive reverts were inappropriate. 182.183.14.143 (talk) 07:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  CheckUser changes

  Maxim

  Oversighter changes

  Maxim

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2024-45

MediaWiki message delivery 20:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Emmanuel Issoze-Ngondet.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Emmanuel Issoze-Ngondet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:16, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Benzoylurea

Hello Dmacks, it has been a few weeks now and the page is still in dispute. Can you have a look at the talk page and see if you agree with what I proposed, Thanks Bosula (talk) 11:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping! Connectivity spotty at the moment...I'll check back and hopefully be able to respond in a few hr. DMacks (talk) 19:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
That was hella-spottier than I had hoped. Thanks for your patience and work on this set of articles/topics. DMacks (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

My edits on Forensic Biology and Emile Achard

Dear Sir, many thanks for the edits you did on the above two pages. From the number of my edits, you surely know I am a beginner. You are obviously an expert. I am still learning, and I do not want to commit an inadvertent mistake. You say that my edit on Forensic Biology was better, but not a similar edit in my edit on the page in Emile Archard. Simply for the sake of learning I need to humbly ask you (1)can one make similar edits [i.e. add same information] on two different pages? I thought one could, because a reader might simply visit one of the two pages (2)How is it that an edit is good for one page, but not for another page? This is purely for learning sir. Thanks and warm regards. Neotaruntius (talk) 02:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Neotaruntius! Always glad to see eager new editors on science articles. Wikipedia often has several articles on related or overlapping topics, and I agree that a certain piece of information should be included on all of the pages where it is relevant. Sometimes the way the information is written might need to vary so that it fits each different context. And as always, the only details we're supposed to include are those that are exactly supportable by the references.
What you wrote in Forensic biology was "One of the earliest studies on post-mortem microbial analysis was published by Émile Achard"[7]. The ref you cited says what the Achard paper was about and that it was an early work in the field. So what you wrote clearly fits the topic of "forensic biology" and the details are supported by the ref.
What you wrote in Émile Achard was "In 1895, he along with E. Phulpin wrote a paper related to microbiology of the dead bodies, which is often quoted as one of the earliest publications on forensic microbiology."[8] The ref (at least the first page that I can read for free) does not seem to say Achard's paper is "often quoted as", merely that this ref itself says it. The situation is like reporting a single data-point but stating that it proves a trend.
So that's why I copied something like the forensic biology wording into the Achard article. And I adjusted the wording in the Achard article to link back to the forensic-biology article: "In 1895, he along with E. Phulpin wrote one of the earliest studies on post-mortem microbial analysis based on forensic biology."[9] That allows readers to learn more about that topic. One of the Wikipedia content guidelines is to "build a web" rather than writing self-contained or stand-alone articles.
Thanks for dropping by to ask! I'm certainly happy to discuss further about these edits or other WP questions. DMacks (talk) 07:55, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-46

MediaWiki message delivery 00:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

This Month in Education: October 2024

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Connected contributor/entry

 Template:Connected contributor/entry has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)