Beirut Archives
August 2016
edit
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Itani have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daouk. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Daouk was changed by Da3ouk (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957855 on 2016-08-30T08:59:23+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I have reverted your edit since the source you used, Global Firepower, isn't a reliable source and can't be used here. And most definitely doesn't trump the source that is already in the article (International Institute for Strategic Studies, "The Military Balance"). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 21:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Please do not insert unsourced info to the article and avoid inserting prefixes which are not allowed per wp rules. --Egeymi (talk) 06:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Mdeirej Bridge.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Mdeirej Bridge.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
