February 2019

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Disappearance of Helen Claire Frost has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:49, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dabura3011, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Dabura3011! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grant Kelley (March 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grant Kelley (April 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
DGG ( talk ) 09:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Declare any connection

edit
 

Hello Dabura3011. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Grant Kelley, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dabura3011. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dabura3011|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello Worldbruce, thank you for getting back to me so quickly. I have updated my user page, can you please advise the process from here? Dabura3011 (talk) 02:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply