Daco-Romans Latins of East

Welcome!

Hello, Daco-Romans Latins of East, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Constantine the Great did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  tgeorgescu (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Constantine the Great was of Dacian origin as we can see on Arch of Constantine Dacian statues in a noble posture. Most of the Roman Emperors after occupying Dacia were of Dacian/Thracian origin. The Romans respected the Dacians the most as we can see over 90 Dacian statues in Italy of which some are in expensive purple marble and all of them in a noble posture.

Dacians/Thracians who became Emperors: Decius (249-251) Regalianus (260) was a Dacian, falsely pretended to be a descendant of Decebal Aureolus (268), a Dacian, born North of Danube Claudius I (268-270) Quintillus(270) Aurelian (270-275) Probus (276-282) Maximin (250-310) Constantius Chorus (305-306) Galerius (305-311), son of a Dacian woman. He wished put the population of Rome and Italy to taxes for revenging the humiliation of Dacians by Trajan who subdued them to tribute. He wished to change the name of the Roman Empire to Dacian Empire (says the spiritual counselor of Constantine the Great, Lactantius in the work "De mortibus persecutorum"). Constantine the Great (307-337) who considered himself a Dacian, as we see in the statues of Dacian warriors on his arch: Licinius (308-324), Dacian from Moesia Maximinus Daza (310-313) Maximinus Thrax, Roman Emperor from 235 to 238. Flavius Aetius, Roman general, called "the last of the Romans". Leo I, Eastern Roman emperor from 457 to 474. Dionysius Exiguus, a 6th-century monk born in Scythia Minor, most likely of local Thraco-Roman origin. Justin I, Byzantine Emperor from 518 to 527, was possibly of Thraco-Roman or Illyro-Roman stock. Vitalian, an East Roman general who rebelled in 513 against Emperor Anastasius I (r. 491- 518). Vitalian may have been of local Thracian stock, born in Scythia Minor or in Moesia; his father bore a Latin name, Patriciolus, while two of his sons had Thracian names and one a Gothic name. Justinian I, Byzantine Emperor from 527 to 565 and born in Tauresium around 482. His Latin-speaking peasant family is believed to have been of Thraco-Roman or Illyro-Roman origin. Belisarius, a general during the reign of Justinian I. He was born in Germane (nowadays Sapareva Banya) in Western Thrace, possibly of Thraco-Roman or Illyro-Roman origin. Commanded several campaigns for reconquering Mediterranean territory of the former Western Roman Empire. Phocas, Byzantine emperor from 602 to 610. Ulpia Severina (fI. 3rd century), the wife of the Emperor Aurelian whose nomen Ulpius was widespread in all the provinces along the Danube may have been from Dacia.

What are the claims them suddenly being of illyrian origin, when illyria was conquered by Romans in the 3rd-2nd century BC and never was anything about illyrians mentioned nor were any Roman Emperors of illyrian origin. They were considered barbaric in the true sense of the word. All of a sudden after the lands inhabited by Dacian and Thracian were occupied and used by Romans the so called Emperors of “illyrian origin” appeared when they all were from the lands of Dacians and Thracians. The Dacians became very important and high ranking people and soldiers in the Roman Empire, they were considered noble. Trajan acknowledged them and respected them. Unfortunately De Bello Dacico got lost but we can see how respected the Dacians were seeing all the Dacian statues in Italy. When did the Romans ever do something like that about their enemies? Never. Most probably if there was no “De mortibus persecutorum” some people would have considered Emperor Galerius an Emperor of “illyrian origin” aswell. So what are the claims them being of “illyrian origin” tell me. Most probably it’s a political reason to not give “too much” history and ancestors/ancestry to Romania/Romanians when obviously they are the descendants of the Daco-Romans and Eastern Latinity and deserve the acknowledgement. Daco-Romans Latins of East (talk) 16:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Constantine the Great. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

Daniel Case (talk) 19:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)