DanRayy

January 2024

Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sleepy Joe (Joe Biden) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

It was a mistake. My bad. Do you forgive me? DanRayy (talk) 13:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

disruption

Please read wp:disruption as much of your content seems to not be productive. Slatersteven (talk) 13:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

jan 24

I think you need to read wp:talk wp:blp and wp:vandal. As right now your actions may well violate all three. Slatersteven (talk) 12:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

ra+This user is a rationalist.

You also need to read wp:npa. Slatersteven (talk) 13:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Woops DanRayy (talk) 13:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

We all make typos, change to the correct link, and note "it's only as joke" is not an excise. Slatersteven (talk) 13:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Another one. You need to get a better keyboard bro DanRayy (talk) 13:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

OK, last warning, one more silly edit, and I shall report you for vandalism. Slatersteven (talk) 14:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Big Brother is watching. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! DanRayy (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes, as we have policies designed to try to ensure this is an encyclopedia. You do not have to edit here. If you wish to engage in comedy, there are sites for that this is wp:not one of them. Slatersteven (talk) 14:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

So you admit that this is an Orwellian hellscape. DanRayy (talk) 14:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Hammersoft (talk) 14:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

DGAF

This user
does not give a fuck.

DanRayy (talk) 14:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Note as well that talk page access can also be revoked, it is...ironic you display an award the Wikipedia community received for "[promoting] the dissemination of knowledge through a comprehensive and universally accessible encyclopaedia. To achieve that, the initiators of Wikipedia have designed a new and effective democratic platform. The prize specifically recognises Wikipedia as a community—a shared project that involves tens of thousands of volunteers around the world." when all you have contributed was vandalism. Slatersteven (talk) 14:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Then DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. ABOLISH VANDALISM. REQUIRE REAL NAMES, IF NOT ACCOUNTS AND EMAILS. Vandalism is clearly too damn easy. DanRayy (talk) 14:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Not really, as you got blocked quick enough. But this is all I have to say now, if this was an example of wp:point it did not quite make the point you wanted to make. You have the field sir, well played. Slatersteven (talk) 14:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Yet, strangely, you are still responding to me, wasting your time. ALL THOSE PRECIOUS MINUTES! LOST! DanRayy (talk) 14:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)