User talk:Danaman5/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Danaman5. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Dacheatcode
Alrighty then, how many edits do you recommend i make? (No, i will not just make like 100 edits just so i can make it there.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dacheatcode (talk • contribs) 22:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
WP:ER
Just a note i have added a small review. Simply south 16:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Danaman5. An automated process has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:1915 Dance by Rodchenko.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Danaman5. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
I went to the talk page of both the main wikichina project and assessment pages and I didn't see your comments. What exactly would you like to know about the sources? (Ghostexorcist 22:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC))
- I left a reply on on the comments page. (Ghostexorcist 18:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC))
- I have made some changes and additions to the article. I would rather someone else nominate it for A-class since I am the sole person who initiated and built up the article. (Ghostexorcist 13:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC))
I read your comment about some of the page needing a rewrite. Which areas where you referring to? I plan on making some changes to the references and taking out some of the info that stays on the subject of his students for too long. Also, one editor suggested that I get rid of the Chinese format (Chinese: EXAMPLE). This formatting was originally done by a very active member of wikiproject China. As I expanded the page, I just continued the trend. I figure the person knew what they were doing. The original person who reviewed my article for FA didn't seem to have a problem with it.(Ghostexorcist 02:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC))
My RfA
Thanks! I will make good use of the new tools, and remain contributing to WP:CHINA with more efficiency. Aquarius • talk 02:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
South Tibet issue
In fact,I can find numerous sources to support my edits,and some of the sections which were deleted by other two users can be found in the Arunachal Pradesh article.IMHO,they seemed not happy to see somethings appeared which favours the chinese claim of South Tibet.Furthermore,some sources are in chinese,and the two guys raise some silly questions to seal my mouth such as Zangnan is not South Tibet,and my english is poor so some sections which I had edited should be deleted.And for now,I had not much time to cope with these kind of persons,cause from the first creations of South Tibet,numbers of editors either wanted to delete it or want to merge it.I am a litte tired of fighting alone.--Ksyrie 21:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
No content in Category:University of Texas campus
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:University of Texas campus, by 84.66.17.239, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:University of Texas campus has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:University of Texas campus, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:University of Texas campus itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
SHA-1
I saw that you failed the article for good article status. I cleaned a lot of the article's pointless plot information and removed three out of six uneeded images. Is that... okay? You said on the talk page that it should have 1-2 at the most; I did read WP:IMAGE. Still, is three still one too many? About the character's popularity and design, I'm not even sure how well-known he is in the U.S. In Japan, I am sure his popularity is most heard of. What to do in order to reference this part of the character? Lord Sesshomaru
- What else did you want to see for Paifu to be crowned a good article? More sources from the Internet? I can tell you now that it may only get as good as Belzi's. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru
Re: Wikinews?
Some news may not be important enough to be on Wikinews. And this page is just for fun, not intended for serious business. OhanaUnited 10:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
YechielMan's RFA
Thank you for participating in either of my unsuccessful requests for adminship. Although the experience was frustrating, it showed me some mistakes I was making, and I hope to learn from those mistakes.
Please take a few minutes to read User:YechielMan/Other stuff/RFA review and advise me how to proceed. Best regards. YechielMan 21:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, re: needhazni fix
Thanks for the Hanzification at Fu Che-wei. If you have time to kill, Legend of the Dragon could use that treatment as well. :-) — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 01:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Done.--Danaman5 01:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Cool beans! — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 02:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
My RfA ...
Hi. Thanks for supporting my request for adminship. It was successful and I am now an admin. If I can ever be of help, please let me know. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 06:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Rfa
Just dropping by to say "thank you" for supporting me in my recent my RfA. I passed the vote, and am now an admin. It will take me some getting used to with the new tools, but I thank you again for the trust. Have a good one, and, as always, happy editing! Jmlk17 05:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
JSTOR
I'd just like to thank you for this edit to JSTOR. Good additions and section-making, usually thankless tasks. So: thanks! -Phoenixrod 17:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Danaman
I've noticed that you've helped out with a bunch of articles needing Chinese character names. Could you help me with the Chinese character name for Song Yingxing? And his book of the Tiangong Kaiwu (Exploitation of the Works of Nature). Thanks!--PericlesofAthens 18:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Also, if you have any spare time, I have made many additions to the article Naval history of China recently, and was wondering if you could polish it up a bit by adding necessary Chinese characters to whereever you think they are needed. Thanks.--PericlesofAthens 17:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Support
Thanks for supporting my Zhou Tong (archer) article's FAC. How many "supports" does it take before FA is granted?(Ghostexorcist 09:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC))
Response to GA review
Thanks for the review. I have implemented the recommended fixes. See Talk:Canons of page construction. Many thanks. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have added material as requested. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
I just created this article on this very topical subject. The subject matter would make for a good featured article, so I am hoping to enlist your help to get it there qualitatively. Ohconfucius 03:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
touching base
How are things with Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-05-11 South Tibet? Be well! Vassyana 05:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
So are you going to bother converting those quotes from Song Yingxing's article about sulfur and saltpetre into wiki prose? I saw that you mentioned it a while ago on his talk page.--PericlesofAthens 22:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Colbert Report FAC
Hi, I've been working on The Colbert Report featured article nomination. I've tried to address your objections to the article (trimming down the fancruft, etc.), and wondered if they had been entirely addressed, or if there is anything else in the article that needs work. Thanks, --Jude. 15:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Question
{{helpme}}
When I have an image on Wikipedia that is already present on Commons, but perhaps under a different filename and uploaded by someone else, can I just put the tag {{subst:ncd|Image:Whatever.jpg}} on it? Do I need to copy the revision history of the Wikipedia file in some way, even if the image is not GFDL licensed? I'm trying really hard not to make a mistake here.--Danaman5 05:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- If the file is in the public domain, history is not crucial but is still helpful. I found the following on Category:Images on Wikimedia Commons which you may find useful.
Please always include the complete image caption and author, uploader and upload date to en wiki ! This is particular true for images under a GFDL or CC-BY license. In the case of {{PD-ineligible}} and {{PD-USGov}} licenses, the uploader and upload history is not crucial.
- Otherwise, yes, tagging it with that template is fine. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask! --Nick—Contact/Contribs 05:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
RE: Followup questions
As far as I know, the images need to be exactly identical copies in order to be tagged with that template. So if they are different sizes and/or file types, they cannot be tagged in that way. If you'd like to move the version that we currently have on Wikipedia to Commons, you could try the CommonsHelper tool. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 06:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Simatai
Hey, Would you mind letting me know what needs expanding on the Simatai article? Ive spent some time there and would love to help out. Sheepeh 03:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Irina Mikitenko translation
Good job - only a few corrections needed.
Info:
Vorlauf = heat (race before finals)
Dauerkonkurrentin = long-time rival (f.)
Running races are generally referred to by distance alone e.g. 'the 5,000 metres' - run afterwards isn't needed.
The now-traditional RFA thank-spam
Dear Danaman5,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to WaltonOne and Dihydrogen Monoxide for nominating me.
Credits
This design was brazenly stolen from inspired by Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.
Your RFA was successful
Congratulations, I have closed your RfA as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions about adminship, feel free to ask me. Please consider messaging me on IRC for access to the #wikipedia-en-admins channel. Good luck! --Deskana (talk) 00:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations! I look forward to seeing your name on the deletion logs. You may want to check out Wikipedia:New admin school if you want some pointers on using the new buttons.--Kubigula (talk) 04:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on your recent successful RfA!  |
Could you please add more detailed references for the content you added to this article as well as complete the references for any books/articles you used. This has been requested in the process to get this up to GA status, but I don't have access to the other sources used. Thanks. ludahai 魯大海 03:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
WPCHINA
Hi, I'm just curious of why you decided to remove the tag after all?--Jerry 00:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- I knew it was originated from Taiwan, that's why I removed the WPCHINA tag, not because I thought it implied "Taiwan is part of China". So you were thinking what I was thinking.--Jerry 01:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your message. I recognise that "Beijing opera" is used by both academics and non-specialists, but I'm afraid I don't personally have a strong opinion that it is preferrable over "Jingju". 17:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
As it turns out, I'd unblocked him before you denied it. I'll keep an eye on the account with checkuser. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 04:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
anus eel
I declined the speedy, as I did not see a previous AfD discussion. (and eels do actually live that way, so it might be plausible) . Please dont revert the decision of another administrator without at leastan explanation. better, a discussion. DGG (talk) 22:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- no problem. If the change was just capitalization, it would in fact be a recreation if the article was the same. But it's a little dubious about using G4 after a speedy because the speedy might or might not have been a good one & the article might or might not be different. --in fact this one was not a good one, because it was deleted as a hoax & hoaxes cannot be speedied- (unless they actually are total nonsense under A3) -the idea is that it might be a good idea if people have a chance to see--about 10% of the articles labeled as hoaxes turn out to be real, & that can be very embarrassing. But I checked the actual article & looked for some references. Eels do not live that way--it's Hagfish that do, and its commonly confused. So we might as well leave it deleted. I left a hint for the author which might stop further re-creation. DGG (talk) 23:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
A request for your consideration regarding CAT:AOTR
| Hello fellow Wikipedia administrators open to recall category member! |
|---|
|
I am leaving you this message because recent events have given me concern. When Aaron Brenneman and I, and others, first developed this category well over a year ago, we visualized it as a simple idea. A low hassle, low bureaucracy process. We also visualized it as a process that people would come to trust, in fact as a way of increasing trust in those admins who chose to subscribe to the notion of recall. The very informal approach to who is qualified to recall, what happens during it, and the process in general were all part of that approach. But recent events have suggested that this low structure approach may not be entirely effective. More than one of the recent recalls we have seen have been marred by controversy around what was going to happen, and when. Worse, they were marred by some folk having the perception, rightly or wrongly, that the admin being recalled was trying to change the rules, avoid the process, or in other ways somehow go back on their word. This is bad. It's bad for you the admin, bad for the trust in the process, and bad for the community as a whole. I think a way to address this issue is to increase the predictability of the process in advance. I have tried to do that for myself. In my User:Lar/Accountability page, I have given pretty concrete definitions of the criteria for recall, and of the choices I can make, and of the process for the petition, and of the process for other choices I might make (the modified RfC or the RfAr). I think it would be very helpful if other admins who have voluntarily made themselves subject to recall went to similar detail. It is not necessary to adopt the exact same conditions, steps, criteria, etc. It's just helpful to have SOME. Those are mine, fashion yours as you see fit, I would not be so presumptuous as to say mine are right for you. In fact I urge you not to just adopt mine, as I do change them from time to time without notice, but instead develop your own. You are very welcome to start with mine if you so wish, though. But do something. If you have not already, I urge you to make your process more concrete, now, while there is no pressure and you can think clearly about what you want. Do it now rather than later, during a recall when folk may not react well to perceived changes in process or commitment. Further, I suggest that after you document your process, that you give a reference to it for the benefit of other admins who may want to see what others have done. List it in this table as a resource for the benefit of all. Do you have to do these things? Not at all. These are suggestions from me, and me alone, and are entirely up to you to embrace or ignore. I just think that doing this now, thinking now, documenting now, will save you trouble later, if you should for whatever reason happen to be recalled. I apologise if this message seems impersonal, but with over 130 members in the category, leaving a personal message for each of you might not have been feasible, and I feel this is important enough to violate social norms a bit. I hope that's OK. Thanks for your time and consideration, and best wishes. Larry Pieniazek NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are listed in the Wikipedia administrators open to recall category. This is a voluntary category, and you should not be in it if you do not want to be. If you did not list yourself, you may want to review the change records to determine who added you, and ask them why they added you. |
...My guinea pigs and the "A"s, "B"s and "C" having felt this message was OK to go forward with (or at least not complained bitterly to me about it :) ), today it's the turn of the "D"s, "E"s and "F"s! I'm hoping that more of you chaps/chapettes will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but a bit scary! :) ++Lar: t/c 18:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Unblock review of Kjoonlee
Hi. I believe you are in error on your declined unblock of Kjoonlee (talk · contribs). WP:3RR#Exceptions gives removal of vandalism and spam as a permitted exception. All of his reverts were to remove what is ostensibly an advertisement for a non-notable mod of a game, but I don't believe it even exists because "Zuma Special Edition" gets zero g-hits. If you take a look at Special:DeletedContributions/Helodriver, the images the other user was adding into the article were all flagrant photoshops. If you read the text the other user was adding [1], he talks in less than glowing terms about a character named "Daniels". It seems rather obvious that this so-called mod is just a prank that someone is playing on their friend, not a real mod that actually exists. So Kjoonlee's removal of this text is covered by the vandalism exception to 3RR. I was about to unblock the user and change the other user's block to an indef block of a vandalism-only account when I saw your reply. Since you have already declined it, I will defer to you, but I strongly suggest that an unblock is in order. --B (talk) 07:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Could you help me out with this article; every single person listed (besides the Zhengtong and Jingtai emperors) do not have articles yet and I would like to get their Chinese character names, especially one for this Ming Dynasty rebellion. Thanks.--Pericles of AthensTalk 18:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
On 17 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ma Yinchu, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Lisu people
Would you be interested in looking at this article about the Lisu people of Yunnan? There is some disagreement as to whether to include information about the impact of Christianity among this group. Their alphabet (Fraser alphabet) was created by a notable missionary, James O. Fraser), however this has been repeatedly removed. It appears to me to be censorship, but if you would take time to review the history of this article, it would be helpful. Thanks.Brian0324 (talk) 21:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I want to hear your opinions!
Dear Danaman5! Nice to meet you!
As I can see that you are very enthusiastic about articles related to China and Chinese culture and I appreciate it. In last days, in Religion in China has had controversies between me and Saimdusan (strong anti-Buddhism and Chinese religions). Please give us your opinions and let people know more about the truth of Asian culture. It's really needed!
Please help me, brother! Thank you so much!
Minor edits using AWB
Just a request: Could you refrain from deleting spaces before stub tags, as you did to Chinese Martyrs? The rules say:
- Avoid making insignificant or inconsequential edits such as only adding or removing some white space, moving a stub tag, converting some HTML to Unicode, removing underscores from links (unless they are bad links), or something equally trivial. This is because it wastes resources and clogs up watch lists.
And the guideline recommends:
- It is usually desirable to leave two blank lines between the first stub template and whatever precedes it.
Thanks. --Bwpach (talk) 13:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
No content in Category:Marquesses of Somerset
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Marquesses of Somerset, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Marquesses of Somerset has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Marquesses of Somerset, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Just to say hai
Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Have a great day ! -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 11:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks!
|
RfA: Many thanks | |
| Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 05:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
Mojtaba Pourmohsen
I disagree with your decision to decline deleting this article, so i've put it up for prod instead. Although this person may be notable in Iran, should it be on the English wikipedia? In my country there are writers and journalists that are notable but are not on this wiki, because in the English realm they are not notable. Plus the article is in poor shape, and it looks like it was written by the subject itself. Living persons bios need more than just local notability. The reference given is an interview with several people, among which Pourmohsen gets a couple of sentences, not everyone featured in an interview should be in an encyclopedia. Also look at his written work, 3 translations and 2 poem collections, is that notable enough for WP? I understand why you declined it, but i can't agree (this time.) Regards, Shoombooly (talk) 09:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Since you replied at my page i will reply here (its on my watchlist anyway): I know the English bias should go away, but even then notability is questionable. Also, there's a Farsi wikipedia, judging from your screen name you might be Iranian, is there a Pourmohsen article on the fa.wikipedia.org? If not, it seems odd there's one in english, right? If there is a farsi version, perhaps you could add it to the page to make it that little more noteworthy. I mean, if the Iranians haven't got an entry on him, why should the english? I hope you get my point, i don't dislike the poet himself, i just think there's a line for encyclopic articles and this one doesn't cross it (yet). From Wikipedia:Bio#Any_biography: "Creative professionals: Scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals:
- The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors.
- The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
- The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
- The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, or had works in many significant libraries. "
I don not think mr. Pourmohsen fits in any of these criteria. Let me know what you think, i'm still learning to handle the criteria. I patrol orphaned articles and propose deletion of a number of them, so the more i learn to handle the criteria, the better. Regards, Shoombooly (talk) 09:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Apologies for taking your name as persian! I added something to the afd page, but im not sure it was in the right location (i.e. right below your introduction). if that's the wrong place, could you please relocate it to where it should be? Regards, Shoombooly (talk) 09:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
17th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China
I wanted to thank for you creating articles for politicians who are part of the 17th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. My current project is to create an article for every single member. I have created a list of all of the articles that still need to be created, which you can see at User:Danaman5/Workshop/17th_Central_Committee_Working. Thanks again for helping out, and keep it up!--Danaman5 (talk) 03:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'll do whatever I can. You're welcome to edit those articles and discuss any issues with me. Thanks for the encouragement.Ramtears (talk) 04:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! I'm really not familiar with the categorization system. They pushed me to do that. I'd rather keep creating stub articles. Once we've done 17th committee, we may go back to complete past ones. There's a lot we could do. It's a shame that Chinese Wiki doesn't seem much better in term of completeness. Sometimes we have to do the google search. Cheers! Ramtears (talk) 17:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- I may have some concern about your newly edited Liu Xiaojiang. The terms large military region or small military region may not be very accurate. It's true that the other two are from provincial military regions. They're elected probably because Xinjiang and Tibet are critical areas. But Liu Xiaojiang is from Navy. First, Navy is not a small military region. It's nationwide. Second, the rank of Navy is at least equivalent to those seven major military regions. Actually, Navy may be somehow higher than large military region because the commander of Navy usually is a member of central military commission, while the head of military region is not. But the positions are interconnected. For example, the commander of East Sea Fleet of Navy is usually the vice commander of Nanjing Military Region. Thus, the commander of Navy is roughly equivalent to the commander of military regions.
- According to original Chinese sources, those two terms should just mean position(ranking) of large military region and vice position(ranking) of large military region. So you may want to find more appropriate terms to describe them. Regards. Ramtears (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry. We have plenty of time. Our project could carry on for years, and I know it's gonna be something meaningful. It's a pleasure to work with you. BTW, thanks for instructions on stub tags. Ramtears (talk) 14:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Redirect misspelling
Thanks Wow, that's embarrassing. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for your concern on Nanyue. Here are just a few modern and widely used english encyclopeadias that refer to the correct romanization. They list Nam Viet first, then the giles and pinyin romanization after for specific academic reasons. This cannot be refuted.
Encarta http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761552648_10/Vietnam.html#p151
Encarta uk http://uk.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761552648_8____87/Vietnam.html#s87
All articles in english wikipeadia pertaining to the matter should follow the same standard.Webster121 (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you (or someone pretending to be you) requested access to the ACC tool located here. For security, could you confirm that it was in fact you that made the request? Thanks, and sorry if this seems overly bureaucratic! RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 16:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Done I have approved you! Make sure to read through the guidance located here, and thanks for volunteering! RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 16:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)- That is very true now that bug 13426 has been resolved and admins are asked for confirmation when creating similar accounts. However, beforehand, when antispoof was overriden automatically, the secondary account was necessary to see what (if any) accounts were similar. Thanks for reminding me to update the documentation :P. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 18:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
-2007-05-06T22:46:00.000Z-Image:1915_Dance_by_Rodchenko.jpg){kind=link}
-2007-05-06T22:46:00.000Z-Image:1915_Dance_by_Rodchenko.jpg){kind=link}
Jesse Hawkeswood
Jesse O'clock Itz all about ME!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesseh400 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
|
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 02:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC) |