Welcome! {{|db-u1|rationale=I would like to leave Wikipedia for some time (and to stay anonymous), as my article does not meet all criteria and is deleted. According to the comments of administrators, I should create the article only in the future when I have necessary sources. (Jacobs516 (talk) 07:53, 17 September 2009 (UTC)) }}
- I'm sorry but while you are free to blank your talkpage we don't as a matter of policy delete talkpages. ϢereSpielChequers 09:40, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Dani0411, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Jacobsen Corporate Services, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ArcAngel (talk) 09:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jacobsen Corporate Services
edit
A tag has been placed on Jacobsen Corporate Services, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ArcAngel (talk) 09:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
AfD Nomination: Jacobsen Corporate Services
edit Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Jacobsen Corporate Services meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.
Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacobsen Corporate Services. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.
Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Cunard (talk) 06:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Advice on company article
editWikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory or a vehicle for any kind of promotion. Articles have to be of enough general interest for an encyclopedia article: the Wikipedia term for that is notability, and the requirements are explained in the guideline on Notability and in more detail in Notability (organizations and companies). Articles need to be verifiable from independent, reliable sources - a company's own website does not count as independent - and such independent references are the best way to demonstrate notability. Also, articles must be written from a neutral point of view, and so people are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves or their own organizations, because of the conflict of interest involved. If you do write on such subjects, follow the advice in User:Uncle G/On notability#Writing about subjects close to you:
When writing about subjects that are close to you, don't use your own personal knowledge of the subject, and don't cite yourself, your web site, or the subject's web site. Instead, use what is written about the subject by other people, independently, as your sources. Cite those sources in your very first edit. If you don't have such sources, don't write.
For more advice, read carefully the FAQ/Organizations, in particular the sections headed:
- Why doesn't Wikipedia have an article on my organization?
- I think my organization deserves an article on Wikipedia but none exists. What can I do?
Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Your edit to the deletion debate
editI have reverted your edit which removed one of your comments from the deletion debate. We don't normally allow deletion of comments once they have been made, because later remarks may refer to them, and it is important to preserve the whole record of the debate. If you wish to withdraw something you have written, you can "strike it through", by putting <s> at the beginning and </s> at the end, and adding, if you like, a comment about why. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)