Daniel Caspi

Henry Murray and Ted Kaczynski

Please acquaint yourself with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Both articles already address Kaczynski's involvement in Murray's experiments. The view that the experiments influenced Kaczynski to become a terrorist is an opinion, not a fact. In Kaczynski's own telling of his history, he was already a psychopath at the age of 13, and not specifically because of any injustice he suffered, but because he found it gratifying. 2601:642:4600:D3B0:C401:E25F:41F2:47E2 (talk) 06:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your input, I have started to familiarize myself with Wikipedias neutral point of view policy and

Hello, thank you for your input, I have started to familiarize myself with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and you're absolutely right, many of my points were basically advocating for a specific non objective point of view.

having said that I still think there is one major issue which is that while the article does address the controversy surrounding Murray's unethical experiments, this information is somewhat buried within the body of the text, specifically in a subsection under his professional career. This makes it less prominent and potentially overlooked by readers who do not delve into the entire article. Additionally, although the introduction briefly mentions the controversy, the "Legacy" section fails to reflect this significant aspect of Murray's impact. For consistency and a more balanced representation of Murray's legacy, it is important to include a mention of this controversy in the "Legacy" section. This ensures that readers have a comprehensive understanding of the lasting implications of his work.

Daniel Caspi (talk) 09:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

The "Legacy" section of the Murray article describes the influence his work had on later psychology. His stress experiments are duly acknowledged as unethical and not something that psychologists are eager to repeat. If you want to add something, please bring a published source that makes that specific assertion about his legacy. 2601:642:4600:D3B0:C401:E25F:41F2:47E2 (talk) 13:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)