Daniela96

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Daniela Georgieva, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Daniela Georgieva was changed by Daniela96 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942991 on 2012-01-11T02:43:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Daniela Georgieva with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 03:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Daniela Georgieva with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 04:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at Conflict of Interest noticeboard

I am unsure as to why you have repeatedly removed reliably sourced factual content from this biography, so I have reported your edits to our conflict of interest noticeboard. Please note that although Wikipedia's biography of living persons policy prohibits the inclusion of unsourced negative or controversial content, it most definitely allows for well-sourced and important negative or controversial information, such as a positive drug test in an internationally competing athlete. If you have any concerns to bring up about this, I invite you to do so at the noticeboard there. Thank you. --NellieBly (talk) 06:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)