Accounts

CSOWind (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Jusperstb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
LooganWWV (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Justtojust (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Gi-ant (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
NaumenkoSvetlana (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Cdpress (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Master-zzz41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Smaryt61 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Danilsomsikov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Kozovaya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Csodessa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
79.183.116.25 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
195.138.71.154 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
66.219.138.157 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danilsomsikov (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Danil Somsikov: I can see several my collegues. We are working in the same company and we are behind one firewall, so it's natural that we use common IP address. What is the problem?

Decline reason:

Under the conflict of interest guidelines, we all agree to avoid writing about ourselves or our own businesses. Whether you are individual people who are all making similar edits, or whether you're all the same person, the effect to Wikipedia is the same- lots of accounts making the same edits. I didn't review all the accounts, but none of the ones I looked at seemed to be interested in volunteering to help write the encyclopedia in any way unrelated to that company, so the block seems appropriate. Don't worry- if your company really is notable, then the article will be better for being written by people who don't work there. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:59, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danilsomsikov (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can you pls. show me where I personally was writing about myself or my business? Why my account is blocked?

Decline reason:

From looking at your deleted contributions, it's clear this is a promotion-only account. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

All of these accounts seem to be interested only or primarily in ConceptDraw Project. That plus the original username makes me think that you all work at Computer Systems Odessa; am I incorrect? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

You are correct, I work for CS Odessa. Which my activity in Wikipedia violates its rules?--Danilsomsikov (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


  • "pls. show me where I personally was writing about myself or my business? " 16:17, 26 October 2009 Danilsomsikov
  • "Which my activity in Wikipedia violates its rules" Danilsomsikov 16:27, 26 October 2009
This is one, of many accounts from CS Odessa which exist for the sole or primary purpose of advertising and promoting of CS Odessa's software products, in apparent violation of Conflict of interest or anti-spam guidelines. per Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Blocks and Wikipedia:BLOCK#Disruption. Wikipedia is NOT a "vehicle for advertising" . Equally Wikipedia is not a place to to promote software products. See Spam case and Sockpuppet investigation.--Hu12 (talk) 17:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • "Recently you created the ConceptDraw PRO spam article 15 September 2009, at 11:37" 17:23, 26 October 2009 Hu12
I have not created this article (and I cannot follow the link because "The action you have requested is limited to Administrators.")
  • "This is one, of many accounts from CS Odessa which exist for the sole or primary purpose of advertising and promoting of CS Odessa's software products" 17:23, 26 October 2009 Hu12
Which facts make you think so about my account?
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danilsomsikov (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I've not made any contributions mentioned here as advertising

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danilsomsikov (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I've not created any advertising articles. Pls. provide logs or any other evidences showing that I've created page and *added there* advertising content

Decline reason:

"You" includes the other dozen or so usernames from your company, all of whom have no contributions other than those promoting your company. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock | 1=Pls. cite rule of Wikipedia that guide you to block me only because I work for the same company, as some other people, who you suspect in violating rules}}

Four independent administrators have reviewed this request. That would seem to be sufficient; if you don't believe those four, you probably won't believe a fifth, either. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply