User talk:DankJae/Archives/2023/January

Proposed deletion of Potential breakup of the United Kingdom

The article Potential breakup of the United Kingdom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is based on highly speculative future occurrences with multiple possible outcomes thus is WP:CRYSTAL and WP:OR. There are two lengthy discussions on the talk page that describe the article as a magnet for nationalist conjecture. The article creator himself states clearly that the article should be deleted for the reasons listed above, see talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FeralOink (talk) 12:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Yep, supportive of that, per its talk. If PROD removed by someone else would support any AfD. It was descending too much into hypotheses' and was much more complex than I had initially hoped. DankJae 13:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Noinclude tags and categories

Hi DankJae. I noticed in a recent edit of yours[1] you categorized a template (thanks for that:) but you placed the categories outside of the noinclude tags.

This caused all the articles that the template is used, to appear in the template's categorization. See WP:NOINCLUDE. The categories must be between the noinclude tags to prevent the template's categories from being transcluded.

I have fixed the problem mentioned above[2], just letting you know for future reference and/or if you've done similar on another template. If so, could you please make the correction(s). Thanks. All the best! --DB1729^talk 17:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Oh I accidentally did it again didn’t I, noticed it on another template I did and corrected it. Seems I forgot again. Will do. Many Thanks. DankJae 20:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Evan Lewis (priest)

Bizarrely we were both editing the short description of this article in the same minute; I've got no objection to your version, which wasn't visible as I was editing. It was so simultaneous that both our edits have registered as overwriting the Wikidata description and {{Short description}} appeared twice on the page! Ham II (talk) 22:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

@Ham II, Oh haha, what are the chances of that. :D I don't mind either version, though having dates is probably more helpful in search, but not necessary. So be free to choose, as in the end I only recently started adding SDs in bulk, and what a rare coincidence! DankJae 22:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

My version had "Anglican" in it because I was checking for possible links to add to Cymanfa Ganu, and the practice was started by a Reverend Evan Lewis in Aberdare who was probably not the Dean of Bangor! So I've now gone for the best of both worlds. Ham II (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Great compromise , fully support, and happily meets WP:SDLENGTH. Thanks :) DankJae 22:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Added a SD to Cymanfa Ganu, hope you don't mind :) Well, if you're developing the article, be free to change it, should a new one suit it better. DankJae 22:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)