Danwroy

Arthur Freed

FYI. Bearian (talk) 01:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Bret Stephens

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Bret Stephens. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Your recent editing history at Bret Stephens shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Danwroy: I'm not sure whether you're aware: David Eppstein is an administrator, the Bret Stephens article might be construed as American Politics post-1932 and/or climate change, and the danger is real. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 03:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Much appreciated, thank you Danwroy (talk) 03:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

FYI, this is not a matter for the Bret Stephens talk page, but I see that you asked why contrarian links to denial. The answer is that an editor named Manul made the redirect in 2015 with no explanation except the summary, which isn't even correct. I have commented on the talk page, but changing it would certainly cause ire and probably would not be successful. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 23:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)