Darcel2268

@Cwmhiraeth: The minor links have been removed. @Cwmhiraeth:

I will remove the links and see what happens as this is apparently the only reason. I will later add the links to his receiving 5 Grammy Awards, 2 Doves, and one Emmy as well as being a touring musician for Michael Jackson, Madona, and several others. I will add links to his poker tourney winnings as well. I hope this will help. Thank you

12:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)~

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack McAdoo (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jovanmilic97 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack McAdoo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jack McAdoo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:28, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Darcel2268! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:28, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Darcel2268

Thank you for creating Jack McAdoo.

User:Cwmhiraeth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remove the links to external sites that you have placed in the text. These are against Wikipedia policy

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: Can you tell me which links that you are talking about? The links I have posted are articles that verify points made in the article. Links verify of birth etc and articles that verify a statement. Please let me know and thank you @Cwmhiraeth:

I believe the following has been met:

What can normally be linked

Wikipedia articles about any organization, person, website, or other entity should link to the subject's official site, if any. See § Official links. An article about a book, a musical score, or some other media should link to a site hosting a legally distributed copy of the work, so long as none of the § Restrictions on linking and § Links normally to be avoided criteria apply. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues,[4] amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons. 15:00, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Jack McAdoo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jack McAdoo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – bradv🍁 02:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jack McAdoo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack McAdoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack McAdoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – bradv🍁 02:35, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Consider this also a final warning, stop disrupting the AFD by moving the article to draft. Express your concerns at the actual AFD. If you continue this type of behavior, you will be blocked. Praxidicae (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the editors that are helping me edit the article to save it from deletion. I do appreciate everyone who is trying to help me.

So you acknowledge that you were given a final warning and then go and do exactly the same behavior that you were warned for? Praxidicae (talk) 17:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Yes. Please delete the article. Nothing we do works or is correct and it is destined for deletion anyway. So yes, please delete the page. We agree.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Darcel2268. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 17:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Please delete

Yes, please delete the article. Nothing we edit or do works even though we have met all the guidelines. The sooner the better. Thank you.

PLEASE Delete the article, me, you, everyone here lol.