Darren Cross

November 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of longest prison sentences served. Sundayclose (talk) 15:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danny Ranes (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danny Ranes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danny Ranes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Darren Cross! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Cadeken

Cadeken, we're not as stupid as you think we are. You're not fooling anyone by vandalizing while signed out and then reverting it while signed in with the edit summary "reverted vandalism". The IPs that "vandalize" are always in central California, which is where you are located. And then of course, you couldn't help but screw up here, making the same vandalism ("Who cares?") while signed in, and then immediately reverting it while signed in with your usual "Reverted vandalism". I could get you blocked right now just for that alone. But I'm going to let you continue wasting your time (as you apparently love to do because most of your edits are reverted), and then at some point I will get you blocked for using another sockpuppet. No, Cadeken, we're not stupid, but it doesn't take much to be smarter than you. Sundayclose (talk) 23:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

I am not a vandal my edit are almost always valid Darren Cross (talk) 23:07, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Just keep digging the hole you're in deeper while I watch with a smile on my face. Sundayclose (talk) 23:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Like when you won’t add John Norman Collins to Longest prison sentences served even though the references are correct AND he has a wiki page? Darren Cross (talk) 23:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Are you capable of comprehending that adding a protection template does not protect an article? Do you think you have some sort of magical power to protect a page? Sundayclose (talk) 23:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sensationalist misuse of primary sources and ignoring other users' concerns at the expense of living people.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)