Blackout in Revenge of the Fallen

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Blackout (Transformers). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Blackout is dead and the character in RotF is called Grindor. Actually, people have been banned for repeatedly adding that very same false information. Please refrain from adding it back in. --uKER (talk) 01:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blackout (Transformers), you will be blocked from editing. The information you added is speculation based on clearly made up facts, which is totally unacceptable in Wikipedia. --uKER (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Do not remove vandalism warnings from pages again. Mathewignash (talk) 21:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to List of Decepticons. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You're doing the same kind of vandalism you were warned for, only in a differente article. --uKER (talk) 20:16, 11 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 17:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

September 2009

edit

Come on man you already got blocked one don't start again like adding false made up info like you did to Grindor The Movie Master 1 (talk) 03:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dude, why don't you just chill? Perhaps the IDW comics will explain any connection between Blackout and Grindor, and then it will be official. Until then "identical cousins" fanfic will NOT be tollerated. Thanks! Mathewignash (talk) 14:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for continued disruptive editing. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. — Kralizec! (talk) 20:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for again inserting the same false information, this time citing a non-existent source. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. JohnCD (talk) 11:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

.

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Darth Vader100 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --uKER (talk) 12:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Indefinite block pending - next unreferenced addition

edit

Please note that the next time you add unreferenced material to Wikipedia you will be blocked indefinitely. You are being notified in this way because this is a repeat problem where you have been blocked for disruptive editing in this way, but return from your block to continue to add the same information. Wikipedia maintains a strict policy of verifiability. Those that repeatedly cause problems and compromise this principle will be indefinitely blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 14:58, 6 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Daniel Case (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)Reply