Darylaine Kransen
February 2012
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Adolescence, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Adolescence was changed by Darylaine Kransen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888594 on 2012-02-25T23:30:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adolescence with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. QU TalkQu 23:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Adolescence with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tgeairn (talk) 23:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Adolescence article
editStop making this edit. You keep getting reverted because the line is addressing what Erik Erikson says. Erik Erikson does not say "13-19"; he says "12-19," according to the reliable sources in the article. That's what we go by here -- WP:Reliable sources. Furthermore, the sentence before it says that adolescense is "largely characterized as beginning and ending with the teenage stage." Thus, the Erik Erikson sentence is providing an example of that. "12-19" is not an example of that because age 12 is part of the teenage stage. The intro is already clear that adolescence is likely to start before age 13, due to puberty usually happening earlier than that in today's world. 50.17.159.152 (talk) 17:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit
I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lacie Porilla. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.
Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.
Here's an example of how to add references:
He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>
== References ==
{{reflist}}
That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.
Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.
Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 00:41, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Lacie porilla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of notability, and I cannot find anything verifying the claims in this article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster talk 16:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Lacie Porilla
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lacie Porilla, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scopecreep (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lacie Porilla, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scopecreep (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ... discospinster talk 22:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC)