Datu Dong

Welcome!

Hello Datu Dong, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. SatuSuro 11:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pol Pot, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, SummerPhD (talk) 14:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, I'm KuRiZu. I found your recent move of article Indonesian Red Cross Society to Indonesian Red Crescent Society. I'm aware about the recent arguments on changing PMI's name to BSMI. However, as the change has not been official yet, the article's name should remain Indonesian Red Cross Society. Therefore, I moved the article back to its original name. Anyways, I appreciate your attempt to help on Wikipedia. Thanks. KuRiZu (talk) 13:39, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Warning regarding abortion-related articles

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Abortion. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Your edit here was clearly inappropriate. As abortion is a controversial topic area, the tolerance for agenda-driven or tendentious editing is significantly lower than elsewhere on the project. Please familiarize yourself with this project's policies on verifiability, original research, and neutrality going forward. MastCell ^Talk 18:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

And again here. — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 10:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Indonesian Red Cross Society. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Abortion, you may be blocked from editing. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:46, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

ANI notice October 2013

There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding you violating the 1RR rule. The thread is 1RR violation on Abortion article. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Datu_Dong reported by User:Ugog Nizdast (Result: ). Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Topic Ban

The following sanction now applies to you (in accordance with the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions):

You have been indefinitely topic banned from pages related to Abortion, broadly construed, and any sections about abortion on pages not primarily related to abortion.

You have been sanctioned for the reason(s) set down in this Arbitration Enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion#Final decision. This sanction has been recorded on the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a topic ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard.  Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. v/r - TP 14:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CMD (talk) 14:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

- filelakeshoe (t / c) 14:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)