Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, David Highfield! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022

edit

Welcome!

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Ouroboros, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 21:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marinus Anthony van der Sluijs (September 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 Velella  Velella Talk   20:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, David Highfield. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Marinus Anthony van der Sluijs, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   18:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I once spoke briefly with Rens after a philosophy and cosmology oriented conference, and I have read three of his books. I found them fascinating. I was therefore surprised to find he does not have a Wikipedia page, which I have set about correcting. He is a pioneer in the field, and coverage of his work is growing. Regards. David David Highfield (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marinus Anthony van der Sluijs (January 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Plasma Mythology

edit

  Hello, David Highfield. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Plasma Mythology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Plasma Mythology

edit
 

Hello, David Highfield. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Plasma Mythology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 02:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Marinus Anthony van der Sluijs

edit

  Hello, David Highfield. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marinus Anthony van der Sluijs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Cosmic microwave background, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not add content back without building consenus. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

"did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted."
That's hilarious. I was adding factual information, supported by a Peer reviewed paper. Please explain why you are in favour of historical revisionism? David Highfield (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have given a detailed explanation on Talk:Cosmic_microwave_background#"Predictions_prior_to_the_Big_Bang_interpretation". Johnjbarton (talk) 16:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply