Davidich2142
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
edit Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rachel Corrie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. GabrielF (talk) 19:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rachel Corrie with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Epbr123 (talk) 19:45, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Rachel Corrie. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GabrielF (talk) 19:47, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Rachel Corrie. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:48, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Swarm X 20:02, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Davidich2142 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I undestand the reasons I have been blocked to and I will not do it again, instead I shall do useful contributions to the wikipedia, please unblock me, I will not do it any longer
Decline reason:
Considering the nature of the edits in question and your repeated violations of our WP:BLP policy despite warnings and a previous block, this is not very reassuring. I'm also concerned that you've been editing with another account anyway, as noted below. Kuru (talk) 15:44, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Please see also User talk:Gylatshalit. Peridon (talk) 11:36, 17 March 2013 (UTC)