Dbchip

Hi! Please use the link to leave me a new message. Thanks.

Air Charter

You keep removing Charterx from the Air charter wiki. Charterx operates the marketplace for air charter commerce. It is a neutral site, not an operator, broker etc. Meanwhile, the air charter guide stays there, a commercially driven, advertising sponsored publication.

Home and Away

Hi, you have nominated various Home&Away character articles for deletion. I have had a go at combining all the articles in a single article (which I admit still needs a lot of work). You can find it at Current Home and Away characters. I suggest we keep this article are either delete or re-direct the others. Thanks, Evil Eye 12:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Looks fantastic! I think we can delete the others since the only inbound links are from the Home & Away article or the other character articles. Dbchip 17:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Grave Creek Stone

Hi, I was wondering if you could let me know, is this a known hoax, as the article claims, or a meta-hoax. Famous hoaxes, of course deserve articles which describe them as such. Rich Farmbrough 23:49, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Template talk:US-airport

Thanks for the comments. I followed the link from my local airport, which is quite small, and the resulting information seemed useful. I don't have much of an interest in whether the link stays or goes, but I prefer to do so on the merits of the information itself rather than the perceived motives of the site operators. Therefore, I think your comments would actually be more helpful as a response on the template's talk page rather than mine--do you mind if I move them there? Or perhaps you would prefer to do so? Thanks again. Demi ^T/_C 21:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Greetings. I didn't do any work to {{US-airport}}. I tried to remove the K from {{US-airport-ga}}, but only the AirNav link remained working, which made it effectively the same as {{airnav}}. So, I reverted the changes. McNeight 22:44, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

AirTran Airways

I removed some of the text from this article because it does not read like an encylopedic entry. The phrase 'still reeling from the public relations disaster' does not sound very encylopedic to me. Also the second link to Atlanta should not be a wiki link. Vegaswikian 22:51, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• Look at the new version. I think it is closer to a solution. Still needs a few tweeks. Vegaswikian 06:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Candi Kubeck

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from this article. WP:PROD is only intended for deltetions that would be considered uncontroversial. In my opinion, the deletion of an article that has previously survived two trips to AfD does not count as an uncontroversial deletion. If there is a good reason for this article to be deleted I suggest that you initiate another AfD. JeremyA 04:20, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

If you have merged all of the useful content into the valujet 592 article then a redirect to that article might be more appropriate... in fact under the terms of the GFDL a merged article can't be deleted as we need to preserve the edit history. JeremyA 04:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Peter Tomarken, plane crash and "deathcruft"

If you will allow me, I strongly feel the information re the plane crash is TMI as written in this article (I believe this qualifies as "deathcruft" [if there is such a thing]). The article itself should contain only the information that is immediately relevant, with the remainder included as simple "Further reading" links. RadioKirk talk to me 16:28, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Replied in Talk:Peter_Tomarken Dbchip 16:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Aircraft

That last edit to aircraft you put back both the vandalism and the linkspam here. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

No problem I did the same thing this morning. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:27, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Exxon/Wal-Mart ranking

Good, hopefully someone will update the List_of_Fortune_500 to keep it holistic. That's the one I ran by. The Fortune list's section need a complete clearness remake by the way. Could you perhaps, if you have the new numbers, update the Wal-Mart page as well to avoid inconsistencies (which was what I was assaying to).

Delamination

You reverted my edit to delamination in Air_safety article. Can you please read the discussion page for this article where I justify it's removal - before attempt to revert again. I'd appreciate it if you could leave a message there. Thanks...

The information I removed is factually incorrect in at least some crucial areas (the anti-Airbus lobby have got their hands on the article it would seem). Note how content applies to all transport category jets and mentions reversal:

http://www.wingfiles.com/files/flight/useofrudderonairbus.pdf

It is not rewriting history. You are obviously biased.

ValuJet does not currently operate as AirTran Airways. The companies merged, but what was ValuJet is not AirTran. The planes, leadership, business model are all different. That line should be deleted. If the user wants to see how the current AirTran was formed they should visit the AirTran page. The two carriers have seperate pages for a reason.

Replied in Talk:ValuJet_Airlines

River Oaks vs. Tanglewood

Thanks, you're obviously correct. Chalk it up to a misreading of a White House article and a misunderstanding of Houston geography. --Dhartung | Talk 22:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

"Non-notable businesses"

I don't see how the businesses that I listed in West University Place are "non notable". They are all chains and they all have Wikipedia articles. WhisperToMe 22:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

The companies themselves are notable. However, their presence in a community, neighborhood, or city is not necessarily notable. Additionally, you can safely assume that most urban parts of the world have a dry cleaners and the various chains that are nationwide. In the case of west U, it's even misleading because the area has a plethora of local businesses and those should be documented to an even greater extent than the chains. Dbchip 01:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

US-airport-ga template suggestion

Hi,

I have a suggestion for the US-airport-ga template:

I am operating the aviation website www.flyagogo.net which provides GA pilots with live satellite and radar weather, draggable sectional and terminal area charts, an extensive current airport database, and a very unique graphical flight planning interface with elevation profiles, weather overlays, and a lot more.

Please consider adding a link to my website to the US-airport-ga template. A link would look like this:

  www.flyagogo.net/?apt:XXXX

(XXXX is the 4 letter airport identifier, usually the 1st X would be the letter K)

Alternatively please let me know where this issue could be discussed with other memebers of the wikipedia community.

Many greetings, Leif Wilden (leif@leifhendrik.net)

Lee Raymond

You must be Lee Raymond's son, you removed his 4 chined picture claiming it was copyrighted, although it is a picture in the public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.64.177 (talk • contribs)

As valuable as your opinion is, I suspect that the Associated Press and Donna McWilliam (the photographer) would strongly disagree with you. Dbchip 01:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Flyertalk Criticism Entries

You reverted back the Criticism on Flyertalk, yet have no reference or citations to any undue influence or example of people getting ripped off.

For influence: The site uses volunteer moderators that have no connection to the magazine. There are often very critical posts of the travel providers that advertise in in Inside Flyer. In addition, there are regularly mistakes and other "deals" posted that allow people to take advantage of travel providers web pricing errors. Petersen or the admin of the site do not interfere with these posts.

As far as the Coupon Connection goes, you need to be a member of the site for a minimum of 90 days and have made 90 posts before you can see the forum. This cuts down on the fly by night scammers. In four years I have only seen a handful of trades go awry, and each time the person has been made whole though policing efforts of other members or the largess of the community. That's a lot more than can be said of ebay.

Are you an active user of the site? Skofarrell 18:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Why I added a current event link to the Atlanta Airport article

I added a current event link to the article because the airport was the destination of the crashed Comair flight. WhisperToMe 03:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Commercial Bias

This account appears linked with another potential sock puppet, Lucent, and has been showing considerable commercial bias with regard to the US-airport-ga template, and apparently other aviation related links, in violation of the Editing policy and the Neutral Point Of View. Please refrain from allowing potential commercial interests influence your editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.33.51.221 (talk • contribs)

I don't know what you're talking about and I also see that you've been banned for link spam. Wikipedia editors and administrators are not going to be fooled by your accusations in an attempt to deceive the community into accepting your spam. Dbchip 05:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Any Wikipedia administrator/editor will be able to examine your intertwined histories to observe evidence of that. How does adding links to free, related informational sites constitute spam? Your clearly biased with a slant towards your own company, and your behavior is surprisingly unprofessional.

Air Charter

DChip, my intent was not to spam. Thank you for alerting me on the rules and regs, I am new to the site. Please feel free to use my operational control article http://www.jets.com/charter_flight_UncompromisedSafetyMar.aspx where you see fit within Air Charter or a new definition. Operational control and transparency has become a major issue within the industry. It is not uncommon for charter programs to advertise wide ranging fleets and place, without the customer being aware of it, on another providers jet. This can be varified in the following article regarding at: http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_4153364 I hope this information is useful to you.

All the best, Nate

operational control and private jet membership

DChip, I'm not sure if I've done this correctly. Could you please review my recent pieces on Operational Control and Private Jet Membership?

Much appreciated.

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ainjel Emme-Heartache Is Boring.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ainjel Emme-Heartache Is Boring.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 01:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FlyerTalk logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FlyerTalk logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:KSMO 1mi west.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KSMO 1mi west.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:37, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ainjel Emme for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ainjel Emme is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ainjel Emme until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 18:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ainjel Emme-Heartache Is Boring.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ainjel Emme-Heartache Is Boring.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)