Welcome

edit

Hello, Dcalexandra, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! clpo13(talk) 20:15, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Dcalexandra, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Dcalexandra! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bunz Trading Zone (December 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wia /tlk 17:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Bunz Trading Zone has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bunz Trading Zone. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 17:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • The draft Draft:Bunz Trading Zone has no realistic chance of being accepted as an article, for two reasons: (1) it is about a subject which clearly comes nowhere near to satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and (2) it is clearly written with the purpose of promoting or advertising its subject. The second problem could conceivably be solved by suitable re-writing, but the first can't: no amount of re-writing an article (or draft article) can change the notability of the subject of that article. I wish you every success in publicising your group, but my advice to you is to put your efforts into doing so somewhere other than Wikipedia, because any time and effort you put into the task on Wikipedia is likely to be wasted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply