Ddiptee

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Prudence Carter (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Dr. Prudence Carter may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Ddiptee! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Draft:Dr. Prudence Carter

Hello Ddiptee, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Dr. Prudence Carter, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://naeducation.org/our-members/prudence-carter/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Dr. Prudence Carter and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Dr. Prudence Carter, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Dr. Prudence Carter. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Dr. Prudence Carter with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Dr. Prudence Carter saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Justlettersandnumbers Please look again at what has become Prudence Carter. I question whether any copyright violation remains. Some of what comes up as same as existing websites are content such as her degrees and titles of her books. David notMD (talk) 03:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your response @Justlettersandnumbers. This being my first Wikipedia contribution, I am trying my best to follow the guidelines. I'll take a look and rewrite those portions from scratch to avoid any potential copyright issues. I appreciate your patience as I master the art of writing the perfect Wikipedia contribution 🙏🏾 Ddiptee (talk) 08:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping, David notMD. After my notice above, the first seven revisions of Draft:Dr. Prudence Carter were deleted and replaced with an apparently copyvio-free rewrite (see the first three visible revisions of Prudence Carter). A good deal of content was then copied into it from here with this edit; most of that is, as you say, stuff like job titles and so on – I'll rewrite some of the rest of it. You may or not be aware that there is a considerably better draft on this person at Draft:Prudence Carter. Ddiptee, as you've been asked below, you should disclose any WP:conflict of interest you have with respect to this person; if you were paid to create the page, disclosure is obligatory. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

WYSIWYG??

Is there a way for me to use WYSIWYG on the Draft Talk page? Ddiptee (talk) 21:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Use your Sandbox as a place to create text and references, then paste into article when satisfied. David notMD (talk) 10:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ddiptee/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Ddiptee/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 04:44, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Copyright problem: User:Ddiptee/sandbox

Hello Ddiptee, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as User:Ddiptee/sandbox, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://naeducation.org/our-members/prudence-carter/, https://www.brown.edu/academics/sociology/news/2021/05/carter-joins-brown, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at User talk:Ddiptee/sandbox and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, User:Ddiptee/sandbox, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on User talk:Ddiptee/sandbox. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at User talk:Ddiptee/sandbox with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at User talk:Ddiptee/sandbox saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Please understand that you may not copy material from non-free external sources. There are instructions for rewriting in the blue template that has replaced the text in the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

IF you have a personal relationship with Prudence Carter, declare that on your User page or on the article's Talk page. Now that this is an article rather than a draft. people with a COI are advised to act as follows: Editors with a COI should follow Wikipedia policies and best practices scrupulously:

• you should disclose your COI when involved with affected articles;
• you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly;
• you may propose changes on talk pages (by using the {{request edit}} template), or by posting a note at the COI noticeboard, so that they can be peer reviewed;
• you should put new articles through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process instead of creating them directly;
• you should not act as a reviewer of affected article(s) at AfC, new pages patrol or elsewhere;
• you should respect other editors by keeping discussions concise.

Basically, as now an article, refrain from major additions of content. Small stuff, such as adding ISBN numbers for the books, spelling, etc. are OK.

As for the copyright thing, I suggest you wait for Just to reply before revising the article. David notMD (talk) 10:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your patience as I learn the wiki interface. Just posted the COI on my user page as instructed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ddiptee Ddiptee (talk) 01:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Article tagged...

...with you being suspected of COI and PAID. If either true, declare on your User page. If neither true, declare on your Talk page. David notMD (talk) 00:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi David notMD, sorry for the delayed response. I'm definitely NOT PAID, but there may be a COI. Will declare the COI on my User page now. I'm new to this, so I appreciate the guidance. Still getting used to the Wiki interface. Ddiptee (talk)

There is a long, turbulent history of Wikipedia being plagued by undeclared paid editing, including companies that promised people articles for a fee, hence the requirements for transparency. Given you denial of paid here, I am removing the is-this-paid tag from the article. Having a COI does not preclude creating an article, but once an article exists, there are recommendations that editors with a COI refrain from directly editing. David notMD (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Understood. Thank you for the historical context. Ddiptee (talk) 15:17, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hi Ddiptee! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Prudence Carter that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. I'll definitely keep that in mind. Ddiptee (talk) 11:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)