Deadbolt44
Welcome!
editHello, Deadbolt44, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 18:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Deadbolt44. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Deadbolt44. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Adam Weitsman for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Weitsman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Weitsman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 10:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
editShare your experience in this survey
Hi Deadbolt44,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
editShare your experience in this survey
Hi Deadbolt44,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
editShare your experience in this survey
Hi Deadbolt44,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editHi, and thanks for the edits to Ellis Island. I have removed the {{Better source needed}} tags, which are used for unreliable sources, since both the NPS map and Justia's record of the official court case are perfectly reliable. Please be careful tagging sources, unless you have a very good explanation for why a better source is needed or why the source is unreliable. Thanks. epicgenius (talk) 20:49, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I must have not been paying close enough attention. I will make sure to be more careful moving forward! Deadbolt44 (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. I suppose I was too harsh before, because this was just recently reviewed for Good Article status and I'd gone over the article extensively. Otherwise your edits your good. epicgenius (talk) 01:28, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I must have not been paying close enough attention. I will make sure to be more careful moving forward! Deadbolt44 (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Cutting too much?
editHey, just checking in- I was looking through your edit history, and I noticed you've been cutting a lot of information out of some retail-related Wikipedia articles saying you're just removing irrelevant information. Some of it looks like it required some editing/refinement, but not total removal. For instance, the information about the store's beginning as a cheese shop and later conversion/closure when the fabric business succeeded in Jo-Ann Fabrics, the more detailed expansion information in Hobby Lobby, detailed closing dates and conversion info for Friends 2B Made in Build-A-Bear Workshop, and details on store decor in Bass Pro Shops that could have been edited to be less advertorial without total removal. I might go through and try and more heavily source or reword some of this myself later, but I just wanted to drop a note here. Pokemonprime (talk) 22:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hey thanks, a lot of the info seemed unnecessary in terms of notability, but I may have been too liberal in my cuts. Happy to discuss anything you think shouldn’t have been removed. Deadbolt44 (talk) 23:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Daily Mail
editHi, I removed the dailymail ref from your edits to Bill de Blasio as it is not considered a reliable source. You can learn more about it at WP:DAILYMAIL. Schazjmd (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know and for sending this over. I saw one of the sources had been flagged, but couldn't figure out which one was the issue. I appreciate it! Deadbolt44 (talk) 20:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Deadbolt44
Orphaned non-free image File:Hoar Construction Logo.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Hoar Construction Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editBlocked as a sockpuppet
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:05, 7 December 2020 (UTC)