Dean.J.Gordon

Your addition to New Chums Beach has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -gadfium 01:40, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Similarly with your edits to Whangamata and Hauraki Rail Trail.-gadfium 01:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Please stop trying to change the subject of the article Coromandel Peninsula. You are welcome to create an article on The Coromandel, but as HMPhillips (is that you?) has argued at Talk:Coromandel Peninsula, these are not identical.-gadfium 04:25, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

@Gadfium: No that is not me, although I do agree with her argument. The facts she has stated are correct, the "Coromandel Peninsula" article is extremely misleading and is full of incorrect information (clearly explained on the talk page). If you wish to leave the article as Coromandel Peninsula, you need to investigate the peninsula and edit the article accordingly. Although if you read the talk page you can see there is a clear agreement that the article is only to be edited if there is consensus about the change to The Coromandel, in which HMPHillips is told to edit the page (after a long debate) and her edits are then deleted. Please stop undoing her, my or other edits as they are factual and correct. Dean.J.Gordon (talk) 21:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Your recent editing history at coromandel peninsula shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Andrewgprout (talk) 01:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  gadfium 02:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)