Deanolympics010

Wikipedia is not a webhost

Greetings! I'm not sure what you're up to with the fiction above, but please note that Wikipedia is not a free webhost. The text above is subject to being removed. Please archive it or move it to another, more appropriate site. Note that removal of this message is deemed as acknowledgment of it. —C.Fred (talk) 16:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

but its my own personell page so why cant i keep it?

Because it's not within the guidelines for what may be on a user page. —C.Fred (talk) 00:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Question

i went onto the page 2000's (decade) but I made it like the pages of the 1990's, 1980's so on, with world changing events, technology lots more information, but after all that it was deleted, i know its probably cause the decade is still on but from January 1st 2010 will i be able to edit it? from User; Deanolympics010, please reply and thanks for your time.

Proposed deletion of 2000s in Young People's fashion

The article 2000s in Young People's fashion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced; original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I42 (talk) 21:58, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 2000s in Young People's fashion

I have nominated 2000s in Young People's fashion, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000s in Young People's fashion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

WP not a webhost, not a soapbox

I have just removed content from your user page for a second time, because it is in contravention of Wikipedia guidelines at WP:NOTSOAPBOX and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Please familiarise yourself with these articles so that you do not contravene the guidelines again. --Yumegusa (talk) 21:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed major reforms to decade articles

Hi - I noticed you have contributed recently to one or more of the decade articles (1990s, 1960s etc). I am proposing some major changes to these articles, as I have outlined in Talk:1990s/Archives/2012#Suggested_reform_of_decade_articles, and I would be interested in hearing your views in the first instance. Thanks. Kransky (talk) 08:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)