Image tagging for File:Isoxicam synthesis.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Isoxicam synthesis.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Indometacin may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • with [[levulinic acid]] gives hydrazone, which undergoes [[Fischer indole synthesis]] cyclization]] into indomethacin.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:55, 16 May 2014 (UTC)   Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paramethadione may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.Reply

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Fetal trimethadione syndrome]] (also known as [[paramethadione syndrome]], [[German syndrome]], [[tridione syndrome]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:33, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trimethadione may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Fetal trimethadione syndrome]] (also known as [[paramethadione syndrome]], [[German syndrome]], [[tridione syndrome]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:35, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bumetanide may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • acid, which is further nitrated with nitric acid to 4-chloro-3-chlorosulfonyl-5-nitrobenzoic acid). Reacting this with ammonia gives 5-aminosulfonyl-4-chloro-3-nitrobenzoic acid, which when reacted

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Indapamide may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 1-nitrosoindoline). Reducing this with lithium aluminum hydride leads to formation of 1-amino-2-methylendoline.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:46, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mitoxantrone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Mitoxantrone, 1,4-dihydroxy-5,8-bis[[2-[(2-hydroxyethyl) amino)ethyl]amino]]-9,10-anthracendione, is structurally related to the antibiotic doxorubicine. It is

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:55, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tametraline may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{US Patent|4045488}} Reinhard Sarges; [[Pfizer Inc.]]]] {{Cite doi|10.1021/jo00897a008}}]{{clear}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bergamottin may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Image:bergamottin biosynthesis.gif|center|1000px|thumb]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


License tagging for File:Indomethacin synthesis 2.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Indomethacin synthesis 2.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Indomethacin synthesis 1.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Indomethacin synthesis 1.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Diclofenac synthesis.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Diclofenac synthesis.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Niflumic acid synthesis.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Niflumic acid synthesis.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

?

edit

You've added detailed chemical synthesis to a couple of articles I watch today. You are citing only primary sources; it is hard to know why these syntheses in particular are important or notable - (this is why Wikipedia as a whole has a strong preference for secondary sources - to guide editors as to what content should have weight in any given article. Without secondary sources, selection and weighting of content based on primary sources is original research which is not allowed here) Also, I am sore tempted to revert, because it looks like you are trying to create a kind of manual for chemists, but Wikipedia is not a manual. Before I did so, I wanted to come and ask you why you are adding this content, based on primary sources. What is your goal? Also, would you be willing to cite some secondary sources to provide context as to the notability of these reactions? Thanks Jytdog (talk) 16:07, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's from here

Synthesis of Essential Drugs Elsevier, 2006 Author: R.S. Vardanyan and V.J. Hruby ISBN: 978-0-444-52166-8

I am chemist (10 years since completed masters degree). I want to improve the chemical education that is the stated goal of editing here.

--Deass (talk) 16:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

yes you are clearly a chemist! that expertise is GREAT! We need more editors with technical expertise. But WP is written for everyday people, and needs to make sense to everyone. Readers don't have to understand the reaction itself but they should be told why it matters. Please be guided by WP:TECHNICAL also WP:NOTMANUAL, and please please cite the secondary source and inform readers why the reaction you are describing matters - why it is "notable" as we say on Wikipedia. Does that make sense? And if you are going to present 5 different syntheses, it would be useful to say something about why each of them matters, compared to the others - are these listed in historical order, order of what is commercially importance? Something else? Please tell us. (and if you could provide more descriptive headers than "Synthesis 1" etc that would be great) Again I don't mean to look a gift horse in the mouth and am grateful you taking the time to contribute, but please consider the needs of the encylopedia, to speak to general readers. It is exactly because people with your expertise can summarize and deploy the secondary literature more efficiently and accurately than someone like me (general scientific knowledge) that you are so valuable -- NOT because you can deploy the primary literature. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Seconded

edit

Hi Deass! I also want to thank you for your additions. I am aware that you are new to using the Wiki syntax, but that makes it all the more important to review your edits, even if this might slow you down. For example, the synthesis image on Ipratropium bromide isn't working (maybe you forgot to upload it?), and the References header on Mitotane is broken (you accidentally deleted a "="). Also, a number of images of yours display the subtext "Cite" – what was your intention there?

Two other points: The "synonyms" you are adding are actually trade names, and they shouldn't be linked because they shouldn't have their own articles but redirect to the article under the chemical name. (Anyway they don't belong into the Synthesis secsions.) And your sentences about the drugs' actions (e.g. "Acetylcysteine is a drug taken for a cough in order to reduce thickness of phlegm.") shouldn't be in the Synthesis sections but right at the top of the article. These are often better introductions for laypeople than the ones we currently have!

Again, thank you for joining Wikipedia, and please don't hesitate to ask me for help! --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 08:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Buspirone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Narol
Indometacin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to DCC
L-DOPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Velvet bean
Meprobamate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mepron
Pirbuterol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Maxair

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation

edit

Your upload of File:Acetylcysteine synthesis.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply



Speedy deletion nomination of Spermous

edit

Hello Deass,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Spermous for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amortias (T)(C) 21:22, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

No, this isn't a hoax. Still, the article doesn't belong on Wikipedia (yet) – see Wikipedia:No original research. In short: we are an encyclopaedia, not a scientific journal. Please wait until this term and concept have been accepted by (at least two) independent secondary sources. If it already has, please add the references. I hope our rules and restrictions don't chase you away... Again, please feel free to ask for assistance. Thanks --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 08:42, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copy and paste

edit

We do not allow copy and pasting as you did from this source [1]. You must paraphrase. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Basically everything you have added is copy and pasted from the sources. If this happens again you will not be allowed to edit further. I have reverted most of your edits. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
You must paraphrase. Putting content in quotes is not a solution as we need content to be CC BY SA. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 10:28, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hydroxycarbamide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hydrea
Serotonin–norepinephrine–dopamine reuptake inhibitor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Analog

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fluoxymesterone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LAH (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Continued copy and pasting

edit

This edit [2] made on May 31st contains content copied and pasted from [3].

As this is an ongoing issues I have had to block you from editing Wikipedia further until we have discussed what the issue is and how to prevent this from happening again. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

There's nothing wrong with copy & pasting if you quote sources etc. Where do you think people are meant to get their information from, just invent it themselves out of nothing? Clearly, it has got to be based on something. I would be doing my own lab work but police seized all my lab equipment. Need to plant a few nail bombs etc to teach people a lesson not to touch other peoples property. --Deass (talk) 17:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes based on something but paraphrased not copy and pasted. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I was just using some of that stuff as a template to get me started. i'm not sure what people are getting so excited about. This is just educational I was not actually stealing other peoples ideas to burgle their money or anything like that. I prefer making synthesis notes on wikipedia than going into the books, although I understand the frustration that it is a free wikipedia therefore cannot make money from doing it. --Deass (talk) 18:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

We cannot use the same words as someone else. Fair use cannot be re licensed as CC BY SA and thus is not allowed on Wikipedia. I will paste the block notice below and you can apply for a second opinion. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Deass, copyright violation is taken very very seriously here. Please see WP:COPYVIO, which is not just policy, but policy with legal considerations. The block is meant to be educational - to get you to pay attention and become aware there is a problem so that your editing behavior will change going forward. Your comments are dismissive, which is not promising. With your expertise, you ~could be~ a valuable contributor, but by ignoring the policies/guidelines you are actually destructive and have put WP in legal jeapordy. Hence the block. If you will not pay attention and continue to fail to "get it" with respect to COPYVIO and other policies and guidelines that I and others have attempted to call your attention to, the block will probably never be lifted you will end up being effectively banned... or if it is lifted and you go right back to the old bad behavior, you will get actually banned. It's your choice. Jytdog (talk) 18:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deass (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was trying to improve wikipedia to get education. I only studied science at school/higher eduation I don't know about legal/copyright matters. It's not my job to know about that. ~~~~

Decline reason:

Indeed, it is your job if you wish to edit Wikipedia. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes if you are not able to figure out copyright issues and thus paraphrase content than we cannot allow you to edit. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

This copyright vio has something to do with money? I understand but I get deceived off money myself they only pay me a paltry amount. That's the economy we live in modern society is full of thieves just trying to deceive us.--Deass (talk) 19:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sorry do not understand what you mean? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Come on, I'd like to threaten some of this is taking the piss. i'd like my money back, or i'll put someone on the bomb.--Deass (talk) 20:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I am unable to understand what you are getting at. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm smarter than these authors who write those books anyway. See my edit here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Etonogestrel&oldid=610907602

For example, in the original document, it says position 11 in ring D.

This is just one example. When I proof read the document, I can see through the errors & make corrections to improve the original file.

  • Actually in part 2 there was an error also. Where I did 2.H2 to remove the benzyl protecting group, in the original file he just did some hydronium ion for this step.

Lednicer has quite a few mistakes in his books in fact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mesterolone&oldid=590127106

See here in this book for Methenolone. You react with diazomethane, then on elimination, it is meant to be the cyclopropyl compound like for cyproterone acetate, and not the methyl-olefin.

Read the actual patent if you want for proof if you don't believe me.

Lednicer even says it with his own words if you read pages 94-95 in his steroid book:


--Deass (talk) 05:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Here's another example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devazepide

See where Lednicer places the final methyl group in the reaction scheme.--Deass (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

But I understand the point about working for free, it's a corrupt society we live in, at least in the UK.--Deass (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deass, your unblock request is being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive262#User requesting unblock. EdJohnston (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Relation to other editors

edit

Concerns raised here [4] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

These users edits are very similar to yours. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about RU-58841

edit

Hello, Deass,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether RU-58841 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RU-58841 .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, JacobiJonesJr (talk) 07:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reason I start RU-58841 page, website called Thekaneshop is selling this compound to public as solution for hair balding in men. Therefore, real world chemical, not just pedagogic.

www.thekaneshop.com/

--Deass (talk) 08:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Structures

edit

Could we please ask that you upload structures to commons, rather than us having to move all of them. A huge drive quite some time ago moved all structures off of en-wiki, and we would not like that to return. Many articles will get written in other language wikis and they need the structures as well. But thanks for keeping to the preferred svg format. You might like to note that there is also a special license for them - {{PD-chem}}. Thanks for you attention.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes that is something you could work on. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

editing via IP 86.27.20.95?

edit

Deass appears to be editing via 86.27.20.95 now. contribs Jytdog (talk) 18:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

And see discussion here Jytdog (talk) 18:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Verbenalin.svg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Verbenalin.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Furosemide synthesis.svg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Furosemide synthesis.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


User editing as a number of IPs

edit

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Butenamide synthesis.svg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Butenamide synthesis.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Tigestol.svg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tigestol.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Epristeride Synthesis.svg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Epristeride Synthesis.svg, which you've attributed to Audet, P. R.; Baine, N. H.; Benincosa, L. J.; Holt, D. A.; Wier, P. J.; Rappaport, B. W.; Metcalf, M. A.; Drugs Future 1994, 19, 646,. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 22:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply