AfC notification: Draft:Assim al-Hakeem has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Assim al-Hakeem. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Assim al-Hakeem (August 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, DeenHelper! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Draft:Assim Al-Hakeem, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't move draft articles into main article space, especially when there is a LARGE number of declines. The article isn't ready (still), there are a fair number of poor quality sources or primary sources and the tone is not what you expect from an encyclopedia. If it continues to be moved to draft space when it's not ready, the only option left is WP:AFD to delete the article. WP:THEREISNODEADLINE, just be patient. Ravensfire (talk) 03:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thanks...but I think this article appeare in criteria of notable person, if not then tell me why?? That's why move this page. DeenHelper (talk) 04:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Seriously, did you read any of the extensive messages left by AFC reviewers? Those answer your question. Ravensfire (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ismail ibn Musa Menk. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ismail ibn Musa Menk was changed by DeenHelper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885474 on 2021-08-26T11:02:37+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:35, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply