Dejandra
December 2015
edit
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Apple Watch— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
—————————————————
Dejandra (talk) 19:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Serols, you immediately reverted my reversion of an apparent vandalism or incompetent edit by user 216:226:127:71 to article Apple Watch. In fact, the last good page edit was made on 6:18 December 7, 2015. All subsequent edits require reversion because they created or resulted in invalid page content. Please refer to the current version of the Apple Watch article which nonsensically starts as follows…
According to analyst firm Canalys.[10][11]
The goal of the Apple Watch…
…i.e. the opening paragraph is grammatically incorrect and, in any case, has no meaning. Kindly refrain from interfering with my efforts to return the page to sensible form and content. I would appreciate confirmation that you will refrain from interfering with my efforts to return the cited article to good form.
--Dejandra (talk) 18:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Dejandra, see my user talk page. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)