User talk:Delldot/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Thanks for the backup and fixing my user page
The vandals are strong tonight..we're at wikidefcon 2. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 04:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
You Deserve One of These!
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I, Persian Poet Gal, hereby award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for all of your anti-vandal reverts! ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 04:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC) |
user User:MchlWngr
You've been tracking this spammer, have you reported him? Izaakb 20:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Knuckles the Echidna
Right on. Hopefully things get worked out about this kind of stuff relatively soon. Until then, I'll stop banging my head against that particular wall.
58.169.219.233 04:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I hear you. Good luck! :) delldot | talk 04:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Don't worry
Don't worry about it; it happens to me all the time. Just make sure after warning the user that you reverted correctly, otherwise, you might have antivandal bot knocking on your door! | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 14:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Civil?
Wikipedia may have a policy of being civil, but I like to treat fire with fire. If someone has been downright uncivil to me, I'm certainly not going to respond with politeness! Funny how you moronic clique-forming, jobless Americans are quick to jump on people posting anonymously, but are happy to let others abuse Wikipedia just because they have a registed nick and too much time on their hands. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.24.158.222 (talk • contribs).
Please explain to me what your definitiopn of a "personal attack" is, because I could do with a good laugh! Have you ever studied English at all? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.24.158.222 (talk • contribs).
Reese Fox
Thanks for the advice. All other users have just put speedy deletions up. I'm new you see lol. Littleredbox 09:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Chapelle
Delldot wrote:
- Hey, you reverted Dave Chappelle a minute ago. I'm trying to revert it further because there's still vandalism, but it won't let me because of a spam filter. Are you able to revert it more? Thanks much, Peace, delldot | talk 03:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
No, administrators' edits are checked by the spam filter as well. (I could modify the spam blacklist, but if a link is blacklisted I'm assuming there's a good reason). When you try to save the page the spam filter message should tell you what link is causing the problem; just remove that link and try again, and put "remove blacklisted URL" in your edit summary – Gurch 04:01, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
hey!
ok, your a complete fucking faggot. its a joke, delete it and move on dont send me retarded messages. and idk if this is a job but if it isnt than get a fucking life.
i hope your house burns down with love, travis xoxo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.218.17.220 (talk • contribs)
wow.
wow.. i am on a school computer and you caught someone! good one. I am honestly impressed that it was picked up that , by the timetable, was rather quickly. Well i can say that I, the send er of this message did not post "nonsense" but someone from the same IP did. But that is rather funny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.181.244.128 (talk • contribs)
sorry about that
yah, my friend was fooling around right when I was about to change that fractured translation on Rain's page. We're actually at school and we're just fooling around, We'll stop. We promise —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.181.244.128 (talk) 05:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC).
Fast!
You are fast. Last four times in a row your revert beat mine. Not complaining... Kinda fun though, getting rid of vandalism but also having a bit of fun, too. Nice job, BTW... Katalaveno 01:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have heard of the AV IRC channel but have never been there. How do I connect? Do I need a separate irc client or can I connect through the web? What is the channel? thanks for inviting me... Katalaveno 01:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info... I will check it out! Katalaveno 02:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, thanks again for the godmode-light link-that should help until I get approved for VP... Katalaveno 02:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I hate to bug you again but I keep getting an error - something like can't revert undefined... I do see the [rollback] on the diff page. I think I'm missing something. Is there a help page for this little util? Sorry, thanks again if you can help...Nevermind... I got it working... thanks again for your help and friendliness. Katalaveno 03:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, thanks again for the godmode-light link-that should help until I get approved for VP... Katalaveno 02:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info... I will check it out! Katalaveno 02:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Regards
Thanks for the warm welcome! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ++ungood (talk • contribs) 20:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC).
Blank Page
Sorry didn't mean to blank the page on Major General West.--KayeLewis 02:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Verizon DSL slow at times, hiccups too!--72.78.122.151 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank You, from Sean Wolfington
My name is Sean Wolfington and i am new to Wikipedia. I read your comments you wrote to the person who claimed i wrote a "vanity" article. This was not my intent. After i discovered that i had a page on the site i added truthful facts from my bio with out the intent of creating a "vanity" article. I did add content to other people's articles that linked to a film we made and if that is not allowed i am sorry. I just read the "spamming" info and now i realize that what i did was not right.
This excerpt from Wikipedia explains what happened to me: "Some people spam Wikipedia without meaning to. That is, they do things which Wikipedians consider to be spamming, without realizing that their actions are not in line with building an encyclopedia. A new editor who owns a business may see that there are articles about other businesses on Wikipedia, and conclude that it would be appropriate to create his own such article. A Web site operator may see many places in Wikipedia where his or her site would be relevant, and quickly add several dozen links to it."
If you can i would appreciate your advise on what to do to avoid creating problems in the future. Thanks again for your fair comments. Sean —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanwolfington (talk • contribs)
My RfA
Thank you for your support in my RfA, which I have chosen to withdraw early at a final count of (10/8/3) as it was unlikely to gain consensus. Most users wanted me to be more experienced, so I shall continue to contribute and reapply sometime in the future. I am grateful for the kind words I was given, and will do my best to improve in the areas that were cited as my weaknesses. Please always feel free to help me along with a suggestion on how I could improve, and if you ever need help, I am ever at your service. Best as always, Dar-Ape 23:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Smile
Sir james paul has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Church of God Image
Hi, I do not know how to do any of those things that you asked me to do. I need help...:) Thanks Tom —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Churchofgod (talk • contribs) 04:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC).
Hey, Well if you read the content of the article you will see that we have a group of churches..but we do not have an official headquarters so we cannot list our church like the "Restoration" Church of God does. If we numbered our membership as they do we would have as many members, but this is not our belief. The only thing I could do is take the Columbus off of the site...but then.......Actually the Restoration is the one that made the site for me. We are not in fellowship with them but HERBSTER got tired of me making changes to their site. I used to attend church with them....they are constantly changing things of their site. As to the jPEG file....I do not know what to do to make it legal. The pic belongs to us. Tom —Preceding unsigned comment added by Churchofgod (talk • contribs)
Chamlong Srimuang
hello what nonsense did i add to chamlong srimuang. that is his chinese name and you yourself clearly know that he is a thai chinese.so everything that you add is correct while everything that others add are nonsense? you want to find people to verify before you accuse me?218.186.8.13 05:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- From User talk:218.186.8.13:
- Hey, I'm very sorry about that, this is the edit I was referring to, and I can see now that the nowiki thing was a simple mistake and not intentional. I am an RC patroller, so I see a great deal of edits by vandals who are intentionally inserting nonsense to damage the encyclopedia. I hope you'll forgive me for jumping to conclusions. Peace, delldot | talk 05:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
phew....i apologise too for sounding so harsh because i have seen some wikipedians who constantly and perpetually insist that they are right even when they are wrong. i need your help. once again i am sorry for sounding kind of rude.218.186.8.13 05:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
delldot can you reply in this page instead of the other one? thanks.=)218.186.8.13 05:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, let me know what you need and I'll be glad to help. delldot | talk 05:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
delldot i am just curious to ask if you are a moderator in here or just an editor?=)218.186.8.13 06:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Just an editor :) delldot | talk 06:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
do you have any friends who are moderators or who are experts in aviation?(i mean in wikipedia itself) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.8.13 (talk • contribs)
- Hm, I'm familiar with some admins, but I don't know if I'm friends with any. As for aviation, I don't know anything about it. You could ask around in the talk pages associated with Portal:Aviation or look in the history of those pages to identify people who are familiar with the subjects. I have to go to bed for tonight, but if you leave me more messages here I'll be sure to see them tomorrow. Good luck! Peace, delldot | talk 06:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
RE: Church of God Columbus GA
Hi, Can you help me understand just exactly why the deletion? Is it because we are not large? Is it because we believe that every congregation is a part of the body and not to be numbered. The only thing I could do is rename the page and leave out the personal items such as the Pastors name, and items related to the church. We have the same beliefs as Anderson COG is this area, except they differ on dress standards, worldly attitudes and such like. SO how can we be different? Just wondering. Tom —Preceding unsigned comment added by Churchofgod (talk • contribs)
watup ma nigga
why dont you like my article homedog? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.109.100 (talk • contribs)
wow
Wow, how do you guys detect vandalism so quickly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.109.100 (talk • contribs)
Thanks for your response
Hi. This is Sean Wolfington again. thank you for taking the time to explain that to me. It makes alot of sense. One other question? Are they going to delete my page? I received a note from one of the editors that i should remove the reviews of the film i made from the article about me so i made that change per his suggestion. Is there anything else i should do to avoid the article being deleted? Thanks for your help. Have a great holiday. Sean.
Ketamine
sorry, I'm pretty new to this whole thing. I was the one that changed that Ketamine Schedule for Canada. If you had followed the link that I had supplied you would have seen that Ketamine is a Schedule I drug in Canada. The page that I Got that info from was a government of Canada website updated in August of 06 I beleive. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Suitsme (talk • contribs) 13:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC).
Thanks for the shout
Thanks for the shoutout on my user page. Yes I do try to dontate some time each day to vandalism policing on the Recent Changes page. Any tools or advice to assist in this would be most appreciated! Arakunem 17:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you from Sean Wolfington
Thanks alot for your advice. The article is not deleted and the notice that was there is no longer there. However, there is another notice that says that the article reads like an ad. I think that was there before also but it was not deleted. How do i get rid of this? Also, would you like me to email you articles that have been written about me so you can determine if they are noteworthy or is that not necesary any longer? You mentioned that i should add credible sources to the article so here are some links that may help with that. If you search my name in Yahoo you will find many articles. Here is the Yahoo link: http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=sean+wolfington&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8 Here is a summary of some of them:
The most comprehensive article was written by THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER, which is the most reputable publication in the film industry. It is an objective article that does a good job summarizing the film and that talks about how the film won the largest festival in the world: the Toronto International Film Festival. It may be the type of source you were suggesting. In the article the film is referenced. This may be an appropriate place to link to this article. Here is a link to the Hollywood Reporter article: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/columns/e3iE9BarJ%2Fq2k7KEi8RgdwxQA==
There are other articles in Yahoo. I have listed some of them below:
-Yahoo search result 4 is from Wire Image: http://www.wireimage.com/FeaturedEvents/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=gls====212042&evntI=2072
-Yahoo search result 5 is from the Catholic Register magazine: http://ncregister.com/site/article/256/
-Yahoo search result 6 is from Catholic.net: http://www.catholic.net/us_catholic_news/print.phtml?article_id=4672 (this is the same article as the one published at the Catholic Register)
-Yahoo search result 7 is from The HOLLYWOOD REPORTER: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/columns/e3iE9BarJ%2Fq2k7KEi8RgdwxQA== (this is the main publication in the film industry and this is a very thourough article on the film we made called "Bella"
-Yahoo search results 8 is from Celebrity Week: http://celebrityweek.com/news/show_news.asp?id=274
There are many others if you want to find more.
Thanks again for your help. Sean Wolfington
PS: On a related note, the film is beautiful and i hope you get a chance to see it. I would love to invite you to a private screening if you would like to go. We are hosting a number of private screenings around the country before the formal release. If you let me know where you live i can invite you to the screening closest to you.
Seanwolfington 04:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)]]
Thanks Again - another question
Hi. Thank you for making the adjustments and improving the article. In the Awards section you included a reference to the U2 fund-raiser. Is this an award? Would it be possible to delete this? I do not want to politicize my bio because i am not on one side or another... i am more of a cause person than a political party person and i would not want to have this content in the "award" section label me along with that article. Would it be ok for me to delete that from my bio? I deleted it but i want to make sure that is ok and if it is not i can add it back. Please let me know. Thanks again for taking the time to help me with this... i really appreciate it. Seanwolfington 05:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Better Articles from more credible publications
Below are 5 or 6 articles written about the film from more credible sources than the Catholic Register article. Would it be helpful to add any of these as references? We are having a private screening in miami on feb 6th at a beautiful theatre there if you want to come.
WALL STREET JOURNAL: http://www.realestatejournal.com/columnists/private/20060619-private.html
A month after Cher's former Key Biscayne, Fla., home sold for $8.8 million, it's gone back on the market -- for $12.9 million. Philadelphia businessman Sean Wolfington and his wife, Ana, bought the waterfront property from the entertainer in May. Mr. Wolfington says he's relisting the six-bedroom property in an attempt to "test" the area's high-end real-estate market. "There's a shortage of available waterfront property here, so we wanted to see what we could get for it," says Mr. Wolfington, adding that he's updated the property's landscaping and added a system remotely controlling the home's lighting, security and entertainment equipment. Cher, who bought the 6,819-square-foot contemporary house in 2003, put it on the market last November for $9.75 million. The property, about 10 miles south of downtown Miami and overlooking Biscayne Bay, sits on Mashta Island, an enclave on Key Biscayne's western coast connected by a bridge to the village, where actor Andy Garcia also owns a house. All rooms inside the three-level home have bamboo floors and bay views, and the property has more than 100 feet of bay frontage. http://www.realestatejournal.com/columnists/private/20060619-private.html
WARDS DEALER BUSINESS MAGAZINE REGARDING ADP's ACQUISITION OF BZRESULTS: http://wardsdealer.com/ar/auto_adp_bolsters_website/index.html
RUETERS: TORONTO (Reuters) - "Bella," a romantic drama by Mexican director Alejandro Monteverde, was the surprise winner of the top award at the Toronto Film Festival on Saturday….. The prize is often an indicator of future Academy Award nominations, with past recipients including best picture winners "American Beauty" and "Chariots of Fire." Last year's winner, "Tsotsi," won an Oscar for best foreign-language film. "I really hope that this is not a dream and that I don't wake up at film school," a visibly surprised Monteverde said at an awards ceremony. "This festival is my first festival, it's my first film. it's my first everything." You can get Rueters logo and authors name for the article by going to this link:
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=entertainmentNews&storyID=2006-09-16T223518Z_01_N16174516_RTRUKOC_0_UK-LEISURE-FILMFEST-AWARDS.xml
HOLLYWOOD REPORTER: “Bella” Wins TORONTO -- A trio of Mexicans triumphed at the Toronto International Film Festival on Saturday when their U.S. independent drama "Bella" captured the People's Choice Award, voted on by festival audiences…. "These Mexican guys go to America and beat the American independents at their game -- it's impressive," Toronto festival co-director Noah Cowan said after an awards luncheon. You can get Hollywood Reporter logo and authors name for the article by going to this link http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/film/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003123305
ABC NEWS: A romantic drama….Mexican director Alejandro Gomez Monteverde's Bella tells the story of two people whose lives converge and turn upside down on a single day in New York. It has won the People's Choice Award, which is often an indicator of future Academy Award nominations. You can get ABC News logo and authors name for the article by going to this link http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200609/s1742675.htm
FOX NEWS: I am very pleased that the Toronto Film Festival chose "Bella" to win their top audience award over the weekend…. It's incredibly charming, with terrific performances by Tammy Blanchard and Mexican star Eduardo Verástegui and Manny Perez. It's directed by Alejandro Gomez Monteverde. It's too easy to say this is the "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" of this season, because "Bella" is far more complex and sophisticated while losing none of the humor. Whoever decides to release "Bella" will have a nice little hit on their hands. The freshness and lack of affectation in "Bella" must have appealed to audiences who had to endure a number of big-name films that seemed contrived, stale or calculated. You can get Fox News logo and authors name for the article by going to this link http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,214255,00.html
InCONTENTION.com: "Bella" marks the debut feature of Alejandro Gomez Monteverde, a truly humble man in awe of the fact that he's actually made it here. It's better to know as little as possible about this film before going into it but let me tell you that it feels both sincere and loving. It's great to see a film that legitimately moves the viewer without being drowned in sap. And it does this in just 90 minutes. If it comes your way, see it. You won't regret it You can get InContention.com logo and authors name for the article by going to this link http://www.incontention.com/toronto/2006/09/beautiful_indeed.html
NEW YORK TIMES WEBSITE: A man whose life is about to be changed forever discovers that sometimes it takes losing it all to finally appreciate the things that truly matter in director Alejandro Monteverde's emotional tale of self discovery. ~ Jason Buchanan, All Movie Guide Click link below to view actual article You can get NY Times Website ogo and authors name for the article by going to this link http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/movie.html?v_id=348546 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanwolfington (talk • contribs)
From Zahir13
Hello. Many thanks for the welcome. Given that I'm very much a novice at Wiki, I would hope you might make the suggestion about changing the name of the category (I would also suggest a category Americans Accused of Murder to include those like Lizzie Borden and O.J.Simpson). If you don't mind? Zahir13 16:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- A word of explanation. I am a newcommer in terms of Wiki proper, but I am a regular contributor here: http://ib.frath.net/w/Main_Page Still, Wiki itself is much more structured and of course several times larger by orders of magnitude. Zahir13 16:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Don't know if you're interested at all, but I've started an article: Dracula (BBC). I should note that I'm something of an expert on vampires. Zahir13 17:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Many thanks for those tiny corrections! Even more thanks for telling me how to avoid that problem in the future. And yes, I've gone and announced the page to the Project that you mentioned. I'm hoping for a good response, especially after the film airs.
- I see the whole point about re-naming a large subset of categories for what is, after all, a minor improvement in accuracy. Zahir13 18:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
sorry
sorry, we worked around it...thanks for your concern —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.231.87.34 (talk • contribs)
- No problem, let me know if you need anything. delldot | talk 18:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Cross of Iron
It isn't a major deletion, it's the creation of a disambig page. There is a section of the article on "other meanings" which is pointless since we have the disambiguation page format. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.198.203 (talk • contribs)
"See also" sections.
I know what a "See also" section is, but do not know whether there are policies about when to include one.
Specifically, I added a "See also" section to the three articles relating to the militia in the state of Oregon (as part of an ongoing review of state government-related articles), I think appropriately: Oregon Military Department, Oregon National Guard, and Oregon Air National Guard. The section was deleted by another editor on the latter article, even though the "See also" provided ready navigation to the Oregon National Guard, Oregon Military Department, and U.S. Air National Guard, all of which are parent organizations to the OANG. Before reverting, and perhaps sparking an edit and revert war, I wanted to know whether there was a policy on the subject. I can't find one, and I have searched the MoS diligently and at length.
I hope that makes my quandry clearer. -- "J-M" (Jgilhousen) 21:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey
The deletion of that article was already discussed License2Kill 07:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
SP
Well, based on how many messages I've been getting at User talk:Khoikhoi/Unprotected, it seemed to be working pretty well. I have my talk page semi-protected because of this guy, but I guess I should unprotect it eventually. The problem is, I know the moment I do he'll just start attacking it again. The only solution I can come up with is to block all of Greece. Anyways, thanks for the heads up! Khoikhoi 06:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh.... that guy. Talk about tireless dedication. Too bad he's not on our side, huh? delldot | talk 15:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Need help
I still need help with my signature...
真夜中(talk)(contrib)
Is there a way to center the "(talk)" and "(contrib)" buttons? --RedPooka 16:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Nevermind, I found a workaround! {{User:Midnight 7/signaturetemplate}}
=
Who cares?, which also fixes the size problem so it's only one line. :) --真夜中(talk)(contrib)7 20:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |