Denizkupon

Welcome!

Hello Denizkupon and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for Organizations

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Bob Re-born (talk) 21:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tourism in Turkey. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:50, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Ephesus. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

How to leave messages, and In response to your message.

How to leave messages: To leave messages, click "new section" (at the top right of the page, to the left of the heart) for new threads. To edit an existing thread, click "edit" over to the right of the section title. To edit the whole page, click "edit" at the top right of the page (to the left of the heart).

In response to your message: All your edits have been linking to the same website, which makes it pretty hard to believe you're not affiliated with it.

• This edit, this edit, this edit added no new info, just a link to the site.
• This edit attempted to undo vandalism (which is nice, but not the correct way to fix vandalism), but also only added more links to the site.
• The edits reverted here added unsourced information and a spam link.
• This is the only edit that I cannot call spammy in isolation. That is the only edit where you attempted to add new and sourced information. However, given your single purpose in adding links to that site, the edit is suspicious.

Wikipedia is not the place to promote your site.

Ian.thomson (talk) 23:37, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Credentials are irrelevant, noone here cares about them, we will ignore them. It does not matter if you think you're an expert. Adding links as references can be spam, and a user dedicated to adding only links from one website will be considered to be spamming that site. Also, your site fails our reliable sourcing guidelines, because there's no indication any editorial oversight or fact checking. Personal websites are almost never allowed as sources. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). As for Ephesus, two wrongs don't make a right, "other problems of this sort exist, so let's keep making this same mistake" is illogical. At any rate, (though not especially well designed) does not appear to be a personal website. The site you've been adding is the personal website for a couple of locals. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

If you really have a problem with those references, bring it up on the article's talk page. Two wrongs don't make a right, their presence does not excuse you spamming. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for adding inappropriate external links. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:01, 27 November 2012 (UTC)