Wikipedia

User talk:Dennis Brown/Archive 47

< User talk:Dennis Brown
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Dennis Brown in topic G4 deletion of Paul Laviolette
Archive 40←Archive 45Archive 46Archive 47Archive 48

Merry Christmas!

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

MBlaze Lightning (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:10, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion
  Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}}  

Donner60 (talk) 05:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Dennis Brown

 

Chris Troutman (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2024. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2024 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2024 go well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.

Posted at 20230101035344

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Dennis Brown,

 

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

 
NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

 

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Happy Kalends of January

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Happy New Year!
Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Dennis Brown!

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
 
Happy New Year!

Dennis Brown,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 22:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ⋠T⋡ 22:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
 
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Reporting poorly-made RfC discussions

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is there any method for formally making a complaint or a report about an unhelpful or unwarranted RfC discussion? I was opposed to the RfC discussion (at Talk:Donetsk People's Republic) for a number of reasons, including (1) its non-urgency, (2) its poorly arranged options and layout, and (3) the disruptive behaviour of the person who originally made the RfC, as well as that of one of the other commenters. The problem with the RfC is that the two users were trying to present it as the be all and end all, i.e. "we get our way if the vote goes in our favour!". But given that the vote was, for lack of a better term, rigged, and given that there was no real consensus even despite one option being slightly ahead, I was opposed to the interpretation that it should be the be all and end all. Jargo Nautilus (talk) 00:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)s.

  • You can politely bring it up a WP:AN and ask an admin to look it. I strongly suggest avoiding dramatics, opinions, hyperbole and such when you do. Even though that isn't exactly an admin function, if there is a policy issue, and admin can act. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 01:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Hello, Dennis Brown. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Kurtis (talk) 22:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Re: Paid editing A/R/C

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Jimbo is sufficiently active that he would be retaining administrator, with 153 edits in the past year. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 19:53, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
  • Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
  • The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a [p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:18, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyvio draft

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hey! I noticed that you deleted Draft:Prap Young as a copyvio. Was there some other source besides Fandom that it's copying from? Because the Fandom Wiki it was copying from is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 which is compatible with Wikipedia. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

  • It wasn't attributed properly and already deleted previously for being promotional. The author's been blocked for WP:NOTHERE and I've deleted the draft again. If someone wants to start a proper draft, they are welcome to, but if it is spam and/or copyvio, it will get deleted again. When a draft has fatal problems and only a few edits, deleting is often the best solution. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
    Ah alright fair enough. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

AE

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I've made an amendment request to my topic band. Hoping 'at least' for a clarification, there. GoodDay (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, this has been closed as withdrawn. You can view the archived request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 123 § Amendment request by GoodDay. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

I've made an amendment reqeust to my topic ban. GoodDay (talk) 23:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Jussie Smollett

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am baffled that you reverted my edit and claimed that I deleted sources that claimed Smollett is Jewish. There were no sources claiming that on the page to begin with. There was a citation that Smollett's father was Jewish but not one for Jussie. I am guessing you know very little about Judaism but as per the accepted definition you are either born to a Jewish mother or you have a valid conversion. That is not my personal opinion. That's the definition Wikipedia follows. If your father was Jewish you are of Jewish ancestry but not Jewish. I am Jewish by the way. Read this: "Orthodox Judaism and Conservative Judaism follow Jewish law (Halakha), deeming people to be Jewish if their mothers are Jewish or if they underwent a halakhic conversion" (Sellpink (talk) 20:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC))

  • Sellpink, all you have to do is read the title of the citation that you deleted, specifically "'Black Jewish actor Jussie Smollett violently assaulted'". [1]. I have no idea how you missed that. Now revert yourself, take it to the article talk page, because you are edit warring and removing sources in an article. The fact his mother isn't Jewish (I understand how this works, believe it or not) means nothing because we follow the sources. Your personal knowledge of how Judaism works is meaningless in this context, via WP:OR Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:12, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello Dennis Brown,

 
New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

AlisonW case request accepted

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 30, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Small request

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I'm correcting a tracked syntax error on Wikipedia called the Tidy Font bug, and one of your protected pages has two of these. Would you be willing to make the following change to User:Dennis Brown/RfA/Basalisk?

At the very bottom of the page, would you change 

[[User:Anthony Bradbury|<span style="color:Red;">'''Anthony Bradbury'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|<span style="color:Black">"talk"</span>]]</sup>

to 

[[User:Anthony Bradbury|<b style="color: Red">Anthony Bradbury</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|<span style="color: Black">"talk"</span>]]</sup>

When links are written in the <font>[[link]]</font> format with the color specified outside of the link, browsers don't agree on how to display the colors. Some browsers display it with the specified colors, and others default back to the standard link blue. If you are willing to adjust this, it would be much appreciated.

Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 04:38, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

  Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

  Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

new article creation

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

hello ccan you help me create an articlee please 876gads (talk) 00:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

  • Two places to start, one is the WP:Teahouse for questions and answers (best to start there), and the other is WP:Articles for Creation, which is a system that lets you create and flesh out your article with less risk of deletion, as it is created in a draft like space, plus you get feedback from reviewers. I'm not here often enough to be of much help right now, the real world is keeping me busy. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Procedural notification

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I and others have proposed additional options at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#RfC_on_a_procedural_community_desysop. You may wish to review your position in that RfC. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Dont mind me

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I made a quick formatting fix at an old RFB page then pinged you just in case. Only to later be told it was probably a Special:LintErrors/missing-end-tag or similar and already being handled by one of them Lint error bots. Anyway, dont mind me/sorry for the ping.

Also now that I've pinged you twice anyway... Hello o/ I've not interacted directly with you since returning, but I do remember you fondly, probably interacting over common WER things? (I used to be much more around 8+ years back(

Holla / how has it been? Soni (talk) 16:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

  • I'm ok, thanks for asking. Really busy, so I am not as busy here. WER was a lifetime ago for me, over a decade. But I'm still here, just part time while I readjust my real life and figure out what role enwp is going to play in the future. Appreciate the feedback. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:01, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
    Understandable. Well, at least I wanted you to know you were a positive influence whenever we interacted :)
    Hopefully whatever else you find IRL is as rewarding as well! Soni (talk) 07:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Advice about an RM

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, sorry to bother you again - you've recently given me some advice about my quarrels with User:My very best wishes. I'm contacting you again for the following reason. In August I filed an RM at Talk:Russian separatist forces in Donbas, which has been recently closed with "no consensus" by a non-involved editor. It was a tough call and a long discussion, with many editors (I think 14 out of 21) !voting in support of the RM and 7 opposing it. I'm not fully convinced about the lack of consensus, and I've started a conversation with the closer. They've been kind and ready to explain and give advice, but I feel that that conversation is not going anywhere and I'm wondering whether asking for a review of the closure would be appropriate here. Note that I've never opened an RM before and I've participated in very few ones, so I lack experience and might well be completely wrong about what a consensus is within the frame of an RM. However.... I think there's a consensus to move, and if there's not, I think the discussion is not over yet and should be re-opened. I'd appreciate if you could have a look at this and give me some advice as to how to proceed, or not to proceed, on the matter. The relevant discussions are the following ones:

I know it's lots of stuff! Please if you don't have time or interest, don't worry and just tell me - I won't be upset. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 13:33, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

  • I'm tight on time, but I did take a cursory look, and the close seem reasonable. One mistake you made is when you started the RM under WP:COMMONNAME you didn't really provide a half dozen links to top shelf sources using that term. It isn't required, but it bolsters your argument. The supports had more "votes", but this isn't a vote. The opposers seemed to have stronger arguments (again, I'm just breezing through the discussion). I would recommend leaving it alone and try again in 3 months, as there isn't any fatal flaw in the close. Honestly, I think Paine Ellsworth handled the discussion on his talk page in a very professional manner, and gave you good reasoning and advice for a future attempt. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
    Thank you for having found the time to review this. I will follow your advice (which is also the closer's advice) and I will try again in 3 months. Ironically, in the next 3 months the denomination "Russian separatists" might well become entirely appropriate, as DPR and LPR are now in the process of being annexed to Russia (the title, however, will not be appropriate for the period March 2014-February 2022, when the war in Donbass was also a non-international armed conflict between the Ukrainian government and the pro-Russia separatists). I will also follow your advice of providing an extensive review of RS. Note that in some way I had already provided the half dozen links to top shelf sources you mentioned:

More possible socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lokeshwaran V R

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Dennis

I hope you're well.

I've noticed three new accounts making edits and undiscussed page moves on similar Indian transport articles to the last two:

Obviously the first has the same sort of username as before. Not so sure about the second and third, but they're both newish accounts editing and moving in this area, and also warned by Liz for making excessive page moves. Plus they are probably socks of each other anyway... Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 16:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Amakuru: A very quick looks seems to show the first looks like a ringer, didn't go further (real world busy today), but you really need to file an SPI case and ask a CU to do a sleeper check. They can dig a lot deeper and find connections that I can't alone. Ping me once you have, and I will try to find the time to dig a little deeper into the contribs and make a behavioral connection. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 17:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Thoughts?

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Dennis,
I noticed this online link[2]. This might result in more disruption in the cesspool known as WP:AA2 and WP:KURDS.
Google translate: ""The first spark was ignited in order to correct and organize the unfounded claims we have seen on Wikipedia recently. r/turkviki was established. Let's get organized from there."

Another link:[3]
Google translate:[4] "Friends, this subreddit was founded on the termination of unfounded claims made on Wikipedia. Our aim is to put an end to the unfounded allegations made on Wikipedia, the propaganda activities targeting our country and nation, to express the truth and correct the mistakes."
Google translate of one of the comments:[5] "we need a larger audience, salaried employees of wikipedia, and I don't know how effective we can be against the current Turkish hatred"
- LouisAragon (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

  • For the next few weeks (or more), I am not able to really spend time on Wikipedia. I try to check messages, but I really can't get into an issue right now. Maybe a talk page stalker can. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) @LouisAragon. I'm not sure what if anything can be done proactively. But I think this might be worth posting at WP:AN perhaps under the heading of an FYI sort of thing. If there are any wiki-projects that are specific to this topic area, an FYI note on the talk page might also be warranted. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

IBANs and AfDs

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hey Dennis Brown,

In your understanding, is the policy interpretation presented here on voting in an AfD when under an IBAN still in force?

Best regards,

François Robere (talk) 08:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

  • That was 10 years ago, many things have changed. I would recommend you ask the admin that put the iban in place, or who closed the discussion that put the iban in place if it is ok. I personally think it is ok if you don't interact, or try to counter their arguments, but I am just one person and I"m not sure what the concensus is 10 years later. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 12:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

 

  CheckUser changes

  TheresNoTime

  Oversight changes

  TheresNoTime

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Contentious topics procedure adopted

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions review process.

The Arbitration Committee has concluded the 2021-22 review of the contentious topics system (formerly known as discretionary sanctions), and its final decision is viewable at the revision process page. As part of the review process, the Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

The above proposals that are supported by an absolute majority of unrecused active arbitrators are hereby enacted. The drafting arbitrators (CaptainEek, L235, and Wugapodes) are directed to take the actions necessary to bring the proposals enacted by this motion into effect, including by amending the procedures at WP:AC/P and WP:AC/DS. The authority granted to the drafting arbitrators by this motion expires one month after enactment.

The Arbitration Committee thanks all those who have participated in the 2021-22 discretionary sanctions review process and all who have helped bring it to a successful conclusion. This motion concludes the 2021-22 discretionary sanctions review process.

This motion initiates a one-month implementation period for the updates to the contentious topics system. The Arbitration Committee will announce when the initial implementation of the Committee's decision has concluded and the amendments made by the drafting arbitrators in accordance with the Committee's decision take effect. Any editors interested in the implementation process are invited to assist at the implementation talk page, and editors interested in updates may subscribe to the update list.

For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Contentious topics procedure adopted

Article - Dr. James Wright

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

He was the uncle of Mark "Chopper" Read, which is referenced, (i don't add false information) if you don't believe me, maybe Google it, before calling someone a vandal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.15.135 (talk) 19:47, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

  • You've already been reverted again, for both adding trivia that isn't references properly and breaking the wikicode. If you continue, you will be blocked for edit warring. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:59, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Ike Awgu for deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion

User Earl Andrew has proven to have a conflict of interest in the article Ike Awgu, even lying about attending the same college. It should be re-nominated for deletion. It obviously does not meet notability inclusion criteria for Wikipedia. I am confident ANY neutral, non-involved party can see this. 50.237.197.242 (talk) 20:13, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps a new editor for the article should be in order. 50.237.197.242 (talk) 15:22, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) Dennis, because the IP had opened their thread (without signing it) at the top of Talk:Ike Awgu instead of the bottom, your reply was misplaced. The IP commented there without pinging you. PamD 20:05, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
  • I finally got the time to look at it, and I would agree that a 15 year old AFD doesn't really prove an ongoing consensus, so I put it up for AFD myself. Pretty thin claims for notability. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:43, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

ARCA the place?

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Dennis, it's been a while. Just wanted you to know, in the coming days (likely mid-Jan 2023), I'll be requesting my t-ban from gender identity pages, be ended. To clarify, is WP:ARCA the correct place, to seek that result? GoodDay (talk) 16:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

  • I'm trying to remember where you got the tban (AE I think), so you could do it at ARCA, AN or AE. Keep in mind, each of those has a different body of individuals that may participate, so choose based on where you feel you have the best chance of getting it lifted. To be honest, I have no idea which is better. I lean towards AE simply because it was an AE sanction, but that doesn't mean that is your best choice. I likely won't be around for it, I'm quite busy in the real world right now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Being as it's an AE t-ban, perhaps AE would be the best place. GoodDay (talk) 03:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Appealing my enforcement

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Letting you know. I'm appealing at AE. -- GoodDay (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Do I have the option of withdrawing my appeal? GoodDay (talk) 04:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

IP Davidian

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi DB. Back in August you blocked 98.231.157.169 for a month due to disruptive editing at Talk:Armenian genocide (here's the section with your block message). They've since been editing as 68.83.217.103 and 37.252.90.66, still manually signing their posts with "Davidian".

They made a new suggestion in January, but they bundled with it some bad-faith assumptions and dredging up of past issues. I posted at their talk page to ask them to decouple their suggestion from the conduct accusations, which they did. After a period of inactivity, they responded today in that same talk page section to add misconduct accusations against Buidhe and myself. It includes a misquote attributed to me, saying that I'd accused them of "bad faith and obscenity", when I'd said "bad-faith assumptions and incivility".

I understand it you'd prefer that I take this to AE, and I'd drop it altogether if you think that's best. I've spent a non-trivial amount of time trying to reason with them, and I'm tired. I could definitely go into "just ignore their posts" mode, which appears to be the approach taken by most of the talk page watchers. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 20:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

  • It is definitely the same person, but the block expired and they are allowed to participate. From what I see, their partition isn't breaking WP:DE at this point, and they are staying on topic without straying too far into other policy issues. Their method of participation isn't necessarily the most conducive to getting changes, but I'm not a critic of style. I would say keep an eye out, and if it ventures into personal attacks, casting aspersions or simple disruption, then something can be considered, but at this point, I don't see a pattern of problems. He's making it obvious it is the same person, which is actually a good faith thing. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Armenia-Azerbaijan 3: Proposed decision mentioning you

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Dennis Brown, in the open Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. 

You are not directly affected by any proposed sanction; this is just for your information.
Your name appears on the page only once because you had reminded ZaniGiovanni to remain civil, and this has been mentioned in ZaniGiovanni's "sanction history" section.

Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:54, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Hoy botnb.jpg listed for discussion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hoy botnb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. SWinxy (talk) 07:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Sandbox question

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Dennis Brown. In the coming weeks, I'll be seeking a full appeal of my t-ban. In the meantime, is it alright for me to have that appeal placed in my sandbox, so that I can make adjustments to it, before presenting it to WP:AE? GoodDay (talk) 18:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Dennis Brown,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

 

  Administrator changes

  Novem Linguae
 

  Bureaucrat changes

  MBisanz

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted for the AlisonW case

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The proposed decision for the AlisonW case has been posted. Statements regarding the proposed decision are welcome at the talk page. Please note that comments must be made in your own section. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

GoodDay's appeal

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Dennis. I put in an appeal, concerning my t-ban. GoodDay (talk) 16:04, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW closed

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW has been closed, and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedy has been enacted:

  • For failure to meet the conduct standards expected of an administrator, AlisonW's administrative user rights are removed. She may regain them at any time via a successful request for adminship.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW closed

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

 

  Administrator changes

  Firefangledfeathers
 

  Interface administrator changes

  Novem Linguae

  Technical news

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Dennis Brown,

 
New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

  Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Vassal Benford Page removal

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You voted that the Vassal Benford website had copyright infringement within his bio, which resulted in the wiki page being removed, but i want to request that you un-deleted this page.

You can search the name throughout wikipedia and see that he is tagged to many different songs and projects, and its imparitive that we have the page relisted as our social impact and profile is being greatly effected by this action.

Please let me know what we need to do to clear this up as we have not posted anything on our website that was not directly related or created by Vassal himself.

We would like to disuss this action and you may reach out to our lawyer Ronald Lebow if needed on any issues or concerns that need addressed.

If we dont hear from you within 5 days we must pursue with our legal team to contact you direct.

Thanks

The Benford Company IPonderthis (talk) 03:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions review: proposed decision and community review

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions review process. The Proposed Decision phase of the discretionary sanctions review process has now opened. A five-day public review period for the proposed decision, before arbitrators cast votes on the proposed decision, is open through November 18. Any interested editors are invited to comment on the proposed decision talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Contentious topics procedure now in effect

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's contentious topics procedure revision process.

In December, the Arbitration Committee adopted the contentious topics procedure, which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period.

The drafting arbitrators warmly thank all those who have worked to implement the new procedure during this implementation period and beyond. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Contentious topics procedure now in effect

Appreciation

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Dennis.

I just stopped by to note a couple of things.

So, recently a certain website not worth linking to was mentioned on some talk page. I don't think I've looked at that site in years - probably was related to some arb case or something.

So I read through the (long) thread and once done, on a whim I searched for my username on the site. Not much, though there was one thread that made me smile and laugh. In the thread (which was about some proposal I opposed at some point in the past), you made a couple comments.

So, first, I wanted to let you know: Due to our past interactions you have gained my respect. We haven't always agreed on things, quite the reverse sometimes, but your comments and some discussions we've had, and also that you "walk the walk" of your words (which says more about someone than what they merely say). I also respect how you are willing to work with Wikipedia newbies - at the "teahouse" or where ever.

Anyway, so, because of past discussions, this page is on my watchlist (along with many others), and so when I saw someone give you kudos that were well-deserved, I thought I'd comment. I'm sorry if my appearance confused you.

Besides that, I laughed at being called "excitable" : )

I guess when I see something worth participating in, I join in. But, over the last several years, I've generally avoided adding the ubiquitous "me too". So I guess when I do decide to join in, perhaps I look excitable : )

And finally, yes, I do things "manually". My few forays into trying out automated tools just hasn't gone very far (check out the contributions of User:jc377 - which was created to try out AWB), either due to it seeming more effort than just doing it myself, or because the automation doesn't do what I need it to do. My most recent look was at category tools like hotcat. Nice-ish, I guess, but I turned it back off.

C'est la vie. Maybe one of these days I'll go look into awb again. I don't know if I even recall that account's password lol

Anyway, sorry for the length, but just wanted to let you know that you are respected at least by one Wikipedian (not that that matters much, I suppose), and that you gave me a smile today.

I hope your day is going awesomely : ) - jc37 21:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

  • I appreciate the kind words, more than you might know. We've often been "debate opponents" on issues, but we both knew that each had the best interests of enwp at heart. If nothing else, this forced us to prove our positions and strengthen them. But I've always respected your opinions as well. None of us has all the right answers, and the best solution is usually found if you can first have vigorous but civil debate, and we have. So I'm grateful for that. And yes, I'm a little more of a hard ass than excitable, but it takes all kinds to reach the real goal: creating the best experience for the reader.
As for AWB, I don't use it, I just use Twinkle for basic admin things. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello Dennis Brown:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1700 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

 

  Administrator changes

  0xDeadbeef
  Tamzin
  Dennis Brown

  Interface administrator changes

  Pppery
 

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Better you than me

Latest comment: 1 year ago10 comments6 people in discussion

Ugh, moving sucks. Best of luck, hope it all goes smoothly!-- Ponyobons mots 21:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Sounds wonderful. I recommend an island in the Pacific; it certainly works for me! -- Ponyobons mots 23:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
I've been working on this for two years, dreaming of it for 20. I had a short list for years, but in the end, the Philippines won out, for English language usage and first and foremost, the people. I'm down to two suitcases and a carry on, after having a fairly large home(s) for decades. I find it all rather liberating. I still have to work remote for awhile, but putting in an hour or two isn't bad when you're sipping mimosas on the beach... Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
I just saw that you handed in your janitorial tools. Good luck with the big move. I hope when you get settled and have reliable, secure internet access, you will choose to return to Wikipedia to help out with the mopping, discussion closing and vandal fighting. Just remember not to drink and delete, never a good combo. Take care. Liz Read! Talk! 18:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
+1 SPECIFICO talk 21:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
+2 --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Only been here a couple of days, after 4 flights in just over 2 days, and I'm 12 hours of out my normal time zone, but adapting. So far, so good. Don't have an end date, just going to be here until I'm not. Crazy different environment, but I researched it endlessly for over a year before coming. But really, you know nothing until you land here and get around for a while. It will take a few months to really get a feel. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 06:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
I am glad to hear that things have gone at least somewhat smoothly. Fingers crossed things continue to be smooth sailing for you. I see that you did take @Ponyo:'s advice, just slightly further south.   --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
  Welcome back! Ad Orientem (talk) 02:54, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Our newest administrator! Shouldn't DB be the one buying the drinks? glad to have you back! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. I'll take a Jack and Ginger, hold the Jack. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 04:03, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

 
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. The project you created back in July of 2012 is still considered active. The lights are on and the rent is paid for the foreseeable future. Stop by for a jack and ginger. Start a thread. Nominate a fellow editor to be Editor of the Week. Or just have a chat. ―Buster7 ☎

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed protection of Lara Trump

Latest comment: 11 months ago10 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, Dennis. I hope that you're well. I saw your response at RfPP ("it was a series of BLP violations that were serious enough that they required hiding the history, so in my judgement, that was the appropriate level of protection to guarantee the various IPS would not come back in a couple of days") to Mdaniels5757 regarding your year-long extended-confirmed protection of Lara Trump. I think this confusion was understandable, as your log summary refers to "(auto)confirmed accounts" (probably a pre-loaded summary from Twinkle?).

As someone who is familiar with CalebHughes, I think that extended-confirmed is not necessary at all because a) Caleb does not bother with getting accounts to autoconfirmed to do BLP violations and b) use of extended-confirmed should not be based on whether the information was deletable. It should be used when there is actually disruption from autoconfirmed accounts, and this did not occur. I'm therefore requesting that you reduce it to semi-protection, please. Thank you, Sdrqaz (talk) 03:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

  • I disagree. In my opinion, my actions are clearly within administrative discretion. BLP violations of this type are pretty serious, and I used my best judgement to use what I felt was a balanced protection that allowed almost everyone to edit, while doing the primary job, which is protecting the person who is the subject of the BLP. Had this been simple vandalism, that might be a different discussion, but it isn't. As per the larger discussion, it isn't required that any other article has the same protection, btw. I stand behind my original protection, and would decline reducing it myself. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
    (Sorry, been quite busy this week). Respectfully, Dennis, I'm struggling to reconcile the view that the escalation to extended-confirmed without disruption from autoconfirmed accounts is discretionary with the actual policy, which says that it isn't. I absolutely agree that these BLP violations are serious, but we as administrators are bound by the decisions of the Community and I don't believe than an IAR action here would actually improve the encyclopaedia. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
    Hi Sdrqaz. How do you think Wikipedia:Protection policy#Discretionary usage plays into this? Wouldn't this sort of article, sitting at the intersection of at least two designated contentious topic areas, fit into that pocket of admin discretion? I'm asking more for my own info than out of advocacy for any particular action in this specific case. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
    I would say that if an administrator wishes to protect an article as arbitration enforcement, they should invoke it explictly (I don't think that that is controversial). In a hypothetical scenario, if an administrator carries out an action and it gets contested, it would be exceptionally poor if they retroactively upgrade it to an AE action. In my opinion, AE uses of extended-confirmed protection make a lot more sense if it's because the extended-confirmed restriction exists in that area. Another valid use (where reasonable) would be if the administrator wants to impose a longer protection than is usually warranted (for example, this article saw disruption over a two-day period – I would have probably protected it for at most a week). The use of AE to "skip" over a protection level in non-ECR areas is unusual and I do not support it. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks for your thoughts. Apologies to DB for the digression. Happy holidays to you both. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
  • At no time did I say this was an AE action. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 06:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
    I know, Dennis; I was replying to Firefangledfeathers above  . I notice that you've recently changed your personal accountability policy. Does that mean that you are not consenting to a modification for this case? Sdrqaz (talk) 02:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
    More of a clarification than a change. If a change is "controversial", then obviously the place to go is WP:AN, and always has been. My notice (which was just put back up a few days ago) is more about historical things, like unblocking editors that "get it" from a year ago, etc. The purpose of my statement is/was to say that simple things that fall under IAR or I obviously wouldn't have a problem with, can just be done without waiting for me to reply, particularly since I'm often gone for days or weeks. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 03:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
    I see, Dennis. In line with your preferences, I have brought this up at AN (permanent link). You are, of course, more than welcome to provide input. Thanks, Sdrqaz (talk) 12:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Communist Party USA Reversion

Latest comment: 11 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Good afternoon, just noticed that you have reverted the membership numbers numerous times. While what you are saying about the citation not being a secondary source, it would probably be far easier to update it with the sources that you are claiming notes membership as 5,000   - AquilaFasciata (talk | contribs) 19:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

  • It has been, check the existing sources. In fact, that 5000 is an older source (don't ask which, this was two years ago) but I searched for many hours looking for a better source, but one did not exist. So, I've already put in the time to find better sourcing, and the best sourcing IS 5000. So the burden isn't on me, as I've already done due diligence. Check the history. The people inflating the numbers have been IPs over the years, which is what got me to do the homework to begin with. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 08:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding the edit dispute on the John de Lancie article. Since you may be busy and this minor editing dispute may not be a priority for you, I fully understand if you do not participate in this. The thread is "John de Lancie" .

Please join us to help form a consensus if you are interested. Thank you!

-- EpicTiger87 (talk) 00:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Catching up

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Just catching up on things, since serious family problems have been taking up most of my time (and to a certain extent still do). Congratulation on your move and the radical change in lifestyle, and welcome back as an admin. Fer sure you are one of the good ones! Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

  • Jury is still out on whether I make the grade, but thanks the kind words BMK. I'm getting ready to bounce around a bit here in the Philippines, do some island hopping. As long as I have internet, I can get some work done. Maybe do a little beach bumming. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Happy New Year!
Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding the edit dispute on the John de Lancie article. Since you may be busy and this minor editing dispute may not be a priority for you, I fully understand if you do not participate in this. The thread is "John de Lancie" .

Please join us to help form a consensus if you are interested. Thank you!

EpicTiger87 (talk) 23:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 11 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Greetings, can you please advice regarding Mhorg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) edits. The editor adds [6] [7] misleading info into articles (discussed here Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine#500,000 Ukrainian military killed or seriously wounded ) and reinstates it after it was removed [8] . The editor is busy with some reverts at other articles - Ivan Katchanovski and 2022 Nord Stream pipeline sabotage - which I haven't investigated and have no info if reverts are right or wrong. The editor prefers a journalist article instead of an academic researcher as an RS Talk:Azov Brigade/Archive 11#c-Mhorg-20230614141100-Manyareasexpert-20230614120900 (It seems that what Golikin claims is verifiable, while what Shekhovtsov says is just his opinion). Thank you for your advice. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 19:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Regarding the first point, it is related to at least 3 Ukrainian sources:
Focus[9]: ""30 thousand a month": Lutsenko calls for voicing Ukraine's losses in the war and gives figure (video)"
TodayUA[10]: "Lutsenko said that the AFU loses 30 thousand people a month: "Ukrainians deserve this truth"."
Antikor[11]: "Ex-Prosecutor General Lutsenko says Ukraine loses 30,000 military killed and wounded per month"
The statement quoted in these articles is as follows: "We need to be honest: the 500,000 they are talking about now, if you divide it by months - that's 30,000 a month. And then we will roughly understand what is happening at the front. In terms of dead and seriously wounded. And we need to tell people the truth, I am sure: Ukrainians deserve this truth," the former MP said."
I misinterpreted the question of the 500,000, it would not be the total dead but the number of people to be mobilised. However, the former minister also speaks clearly of the 30,000 deaths per month (note how all the headlines empathise with this). I did not reverted the "500,000" part, only the factual part of the 30,000. Mhorg (talk) 20:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Please, also note that this information was reported by ABC News:[12] "Yuriy Lutsenko claimed that around 30,000 Ukrainian troops are now being killed or badly wounded per month and that the total casualty toll for wounded and killed in the war is around 500,000." Mhorg (talk) 20:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Maybe someone else can take a look. I have intentionally stayed out of AE related topics for some time now, and frankly, I feel better for it. This isn't really a topic I'm expert at anyway. Dennis Brown 2¢ 11:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

G4 deletion of Paul Laviolette

Latest comment: 10 months ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Dennis,

I'm looking at the version of Paul Laviolette at the time that it was speedied, and also the versions at Paul LaViolette at the time they were nominated for deletion (2nd nomination, 3rd nomination) and actually deleted (2nd nomination, 3rd nomination).

I don't think that this was a valid WP:G4, as there were substantial differences between the versions that were deleted at AfD and the version that was speedied. I genuinely think this was re-created de novo, 14ish years after the article was most recently taken to AfD. And some of the sources in the speedied article (e.g. the paper " Scientific Misconduct: Three Forms that Directly Harm Others as the Modus Operandi of Mill’s Tyranny of the Prevailing Opinion") were published after the most recent deletion discussion.

There are some copyproblems with the article content (copy-pasting from the aforementioned paper, for example), but I don't think they rise to a WP:G12 level, either. There are also some problems with a good bit of uncited material. But I don't think this warrants a speedy inasmuch as it warrants draftification and removal of the copyproblem. Through that lens, are you willing to restore the article to draftspace, sans the "censorship" section? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm on my mobile right now, using my Alt account but please feel free to modify my actions as you see fit. Farmer Brown - 2¢ 03:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC) Farmer Brown - 2¢ 03:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dennis_Brown/Archive_47&oldid=1202480686"