Welcome

edit
Hello DerekWinters, and Welcome to Wikipedia! 

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

DerekWinters, good luck, and have fun. --Adrian (talk) 22:05, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of loan words in Chinese, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mongolian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Devanagari ka for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devanagari ka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devanagari ka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GSMR (talk) 17:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kakāra

edit

Is ककार the Sanskrit name? What about कवर्ण? Gorobay (talk) 19:29, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Both are suitable names for the letter क, but only in Indo-Aryan languages, however ककार is more common when referring Sanskrit. I am not sure of the name of क in other non-Indo-Aryan languages such as Newari/Nepal Bhasa and Bodo. DerekWinters (talk) 20:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of loan words in Hindi for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of loan words in Hindi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of loan words in Hindi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 23:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of loan words in Hindi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dravidian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Periodic table (Hindi)

edit

 Template:Periodic table (Hindi) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DePiep (talk) 17:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of loanwords in Tagalog, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your edits on cy

edit

Thanks for you edits on cy (Welsh) Wikipedia: aticles w:cy:Nitrogen and w:cy:Hydrogen. Both alternative words you suggest seem to be incorrect (Nitrogen = "blorai" and Hydrogen = "ulai". What are your sources for these edits? I have reverted your edits and would like an explanation, please. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:27, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I had been looking through an old Welsh dictionary (1800s ish) and stumbled upon "ulefai" for oxygen. I was quite intrigued and a little searching around brought up w:cy:Hen enwau Cymraeg am yr elfennau, so I thought to add them. DerekWinters (talk) 22:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hypercorrection may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Sanskrit is a language well-known for its high level of consonant combinations in speech (ex. , which are often simplified in its daughter languages: the Prakrits and Pali (also truly a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hypercorrection

edit

Hello, DerekWinters. This seems like a valuable addition, but it desperately needs sourcing. Could you add some citations, please? (Yes, I know, the entire page desperately needs sourcing, but I can't easily track down the users who added the older sections.) Thanks, and happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 08:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Cnilep. I added a source, but it was the only one I could find. I can't find my other sources. Do forgive me. However, should I find my other sources, I shall be sure to cite them. DerekWinters (talk) 16:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Help:IPA for Kashmiri

edit

I based the vowels from this source, the vowels from the source you have shown me are the same, but represented by different Devanagari letters because orthography is not regulated. Michael Peter Fustumum (talk) 11:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion nomination

edit

Hello. A help page you created has been nominated for deletion. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/IPA for X. — Ƶ§œš¹ [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 00:29, 22 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Inuinnaqtun

edit

Inuinnaqtun is not really seen in syllabics. It uses the Roman orthography see Kitikmeot Inuit Association Languages and Nunavut's Official Languages. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:39, 25 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

March 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm SMC. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Diencephalon— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SMC (talk) 22:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your changes to List of religions and spiritual traditions

edit

Why are you changing 'mythology' to 'religion' in so many links, when the links that result are redirects? Of 5 changes I checked 3 became redirects, e.g. Lugbara religion and Zulu religion. Did you check all these? Can you the name changes explain a bit, as perhaps you should have done in the edit summary? Oh, and if you are going to create the Mesoamerican section by pulling everything not North American out of List_of_religions_and_spiritual_traditions#American then maybe you should have retitled that to "Native American". Oh, but you forgot Olmec religion, the mother religion. But, hey, then maybe you should have done South American for Inca mythology? Oh, but that's different from Religion in the Inca Empire? What a mess... and I must be grumpy. Shenme (talk) 04:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

 
  • Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
  • We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
  • We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form—most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages!

Articles moves

edit

Hi Derek, I notice you've made a few moves (since reverted): Talus bone -> Ankle bone, Tibia --> Shin bone, Patella --> Knee cap. It's great to have another enthusiastic editor on WP. However please propose the mergers first by writing on the articles talk pages. This gives other users the chance to weigh in and often allows a more nuanced approach. If you want to, please consider also leave a note at the talk page of WikiProject Anatomy. "Ankle bone" is unlikely to have consensus for moving, as multiple bones make up the ankle (See ankle). The same goes for the patella, as "knee cap" refers to the structure in surface anatomy whereas patella refers to the bone. Cheers --Tom (LT) (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hyoid bone— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 19:35, 14 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm LT910001. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fibula because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please discontinue this disruptive editing without first building a consensus. You have been contacted be other users. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tweenbrain

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tweenbrain, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tom (LT) (talk) 05:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Tweenbrain listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tweenbrain. Since you had some involvement with the Tweenbrain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Old Bengali language

edit
 

The article Old Bengali language has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable language. No evidence of in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015

edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Malacca Art Gallery. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 00:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop editing anatomy articles without first seeking consensus as I have explained above. I have reported you to the administrators noticeboard here: [1]. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 11:49, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • DerekWinters, you really need to come to this noticeboard discussion and respond to the issues raised there. Your editing has proved repeatedly disruptive and sanctions may be imposed if you continue to edit along these lines. (The discussion should be at [2], or you can look for your username in the table of contents.) Softlavender (talk) 12:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 15:49, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of loanwords in Gujarati for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of loanwords in Gujarati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of loanwords in Gujarati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PepperBeast (talk) 19:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply