Derjederman
June 2009
editWelcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Caroline Flint has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. M.H.True Romance iS Dead 13:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment has been posted about you at [[1]] thanks
Caroline Flint
editThe edit you reverted regarding the wording of the Daily Mail quote was not a pointless edit, but a matter of substance - it is neutral to say that a source (the Daily Mail) took a certain position (providing that where alternate views exist they are used for contrast) but it is not neutral to directly assume that position in the article. The neutral point of view is the key principle of Wikipedia. 81.107.151.32 (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
"Creating beauty" wasn't in the cited source. Can you say where you got it? --Old Moonraker (talk) 00:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
February 2011
editPlease do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Jeremy Paxman. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 00:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
September 2011
editPlease do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Simon Heffer. Thank you. Robofish (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- I was referring specifically to this edit, made by your account last February:[2] The text you added says Heffer 'once even claimed "Stalin had his moments"', but the source provided, [3], shows nothing of the kind. Am I missing something here? Robofish (talk) 15:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC)